User talk:Andreasegde: Difference between revisions
→Amateurs: re |
→Tone it down a bit please: new section |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
'''Stub articles are a drain on Wikipedia's resources. They should be deleted after six months if they are not accepted as a Good Article (GA). Allowing them to be here encourages lazy editing.'''--[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] ([[User talk:Andreasegde#top|talk]]) 23:29, 8 August 2011 (UTC) |
'''Stub articles are a drain on Wikipedia's resources. They should be deleted after six months if they are not accepted as a Good Article (GA). Allowing them to be here encourages lazy editing.'''--[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] ([[User talk:Andreasegde#top|talk]]) 23:29, 8 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
:I do think that all the one line articles on villages with six people in them are not worth keeping, but to say that all stubs are useless, well that's just yelling loudly without a whole bunch behind it. I didn't set out to create a GA, I set out to create a well referenced and relatively complete article. Considering that a) I'm not an article worker, and b) I did exactly what I set out to do, I am, regardless of your opinion, quite proud of my work. [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 00:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC) |
:I do think that all the one line articles on villages with six people in them are not worth keeping, but to say that all stubs are useless, well that's just yelling loudly without a whole bunch behind it. I didn't set out to create a GA, I set out to create a well referenced and relatively complete article. Considering that a) I'm not an article worker, and b) I did exactly what I set out to do, I am, regardless of your opinion, quite proud of my work. [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 00:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Tone it down a bit please == |
|||
You are being unneeedingly confrontational when you interact with other editors. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:J3Mrs&diff=prev&oldid=443757435 This comment] stood out in particular, but there are many more like it in your editing history. Please adopt a less confrontational tone when you interact with others. It is rude and it doesn't help to build a collaborative atmosphere that Wikipedia needs in order to survive. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 01:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:01, 9 August 2011
 Archives |
|---|
|
Barnstars · The and Non-notable relatives · 2· 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 |
Amateurs
I think that anybody who is actually proud of creating a stub article should be slapped with a fish and told to grow up.--andreasegde (talk) 22:35, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Curb your elitism. Writing for Wikipedia isn't easy, it's an acquired skill. I'm quite proud of my stubs. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Are you proud of your local bus stop? Should I start a stub about my favourite colour? Stubs are a waste of space, and a drain on Wikipedia's resources.--andreasegde (talk) 23:20, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- BTW, this particular stub: Magic: The Gathering – Duels of the Planeswalkers 2012, would never pass a GAR. I suppose that doesn't matter very much, does it? Are you here to edit your favourite game, or to create something encyclopedic? On second thoughts, don't answer that one. :))--andreasegde (talk) 23:26, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Stub articles are a drain on Wikipedia's resources. They should be deleted after six months if they are not accepted as a Good Article (GA). Allowing them to be here encourages lazy editing.--andreasegde (talk) 23:29, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- I do think that all the one line articles on villages with six people in them are not worth keeping, but to say that all stubs are useless, well that's just yelling loudly without a whole bunch behind it. I didn't set out to create a GA, I set out to create a well referenced and relatively complete article. Considering that a) I'm not an article worker, and b) I did exactly what I set out to do, I am, regardless of your opinion, quite proud of my work. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Tone it down a bit please
You are being unneeedingly confrontational when you interact with other editors. This comment stood out in particular, but there are many more like it in your editing history. Please adopt a less confrontational tone when you interact with others. It is rude and it doesn't help to build a collaborative atmosphere that Wikipedia needs in order to survive. --Jayron32 01:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC)