User talk:Aoidh

Want to leave me a message? Please click here to add a new subject to my talk page.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

Welcome

Please feel free to leave me a message! :) - SudoGhost (talk) 02:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 03:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. :) - SudoGhost (talk) 03:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]B&Q......what exactly are you trying to do?!raseaC^{talk to me} 20:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Well apparently I'm trying to break the article. :) But no, chalk that up to me not paying attention. I've reverted that silly edit I made, and attempted to open an invitation for discussion on the talk page. - SudoGhost (talk) 20:50, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] Yeah, I've tried that. And on the user's talk. Not sure it's going to happen. I thought it was an open and shut case, there's little reason to have it in the article but didn't want to get into an edit war. raseaC^{talk to me} 20:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] Well, I managed to not break anything this time, so hopefully the other editor will take this opportunity to use the discussion page.. - SudoGhost (talk) 20:57, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Abhira Tribei am trying to correct this factually wrong article but you are disrupting my correct editing.this is against the spirit of wikipediaI respectfully disagree. I invite you to open a discussion on the talk page, so that people can reach a consensus as to the edits you have proposed. I am not the only one who has reverted your edits, and I have done so because it seems that you are removing valid, sourced information (usually having to do with any positive mention of the British people) and are replacing it with content you feel is more appropriate. In this instance (when multiple users have reverted your edits), it is best to use the aforementioned talk page to explain why you feel these edits should be made, and allow the users to make a consensus either towards or against the changes. - SudoGhost (talk) 04:53, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] this article showing only one sided point of view of controversial origin of abhira.i am presenting another and morte accepted point of view today. Again, I ask that you please use the talk page to discuss this before reinserting the changes. - SudoGhost (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]ok thanks for guide.i have edited now with reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ancient indian historian (talk • contribs) 05:10, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Please helpOkay, so even despite everything noone seems to notice reality. But, come on now, is it really okay for a Wikipedia user to be blocked and then to use another account a few minutes later? See this edit and this one from this blocked user. If such a black-and-white violation of the rules will be approved then I swear to God this place is useless. I'm totally deleting my account and starting another then. Sugar-Baby-Love (talk) 06:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]VermapriyaThanks for picking up on this (again). I see that you have opened an SPI. It is a Duck case but I'm wondering if the SPI has been opened correctly because there seems to be no section for "comments by other users", which usually appears. Any ideas? - Sitush (talk) 04:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]I'm honestly not sure. I was discussing it on the IRC, but wasn't aware that I had opened a new SPI. It may have been the template I placed at User_talk:124.247.246.146. - SudoGhost (talk) 04:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Angelo RulesHey. Just edited the Angelo Rules page for accuracy but you have changed it back. What you have changed it back to is incorrect. Why did you change it back? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.177.23.242 (talk) 11:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]If you could provide sources that show the reflected changes, that would help greatly. Please see WP:V for more information about this. I changed the lead paragraph back to its original state because the way it was rewritten was made to sound like an advertisement, which is counterintuitive to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. - SudoGhost (talk) 11:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Sure. Please check out the creator's website – www.teamto.com. Super RTL has nothing to do with the production of the series. It's just one of the channels it is broadcast on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.177.23.242 (talk) 11:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Acronym and initialismI request you to add our site too in the external links section. We did changes as per your comment. Also, you must note that the sites in the list are filled with google Ads in results. Also, the top sites mentioned in them are from same owner and sharing a common database. We may be small, but our results page are clear and no confusion with the Advertisements and results. Also, we gave a description which is our + point over others. Just giving an acronym and few expansions are not enough. Even I can make acronyms!! GBTM - Get Back To Me, CMB - Call Me Back...these are acronyms, isn't it? But you have to mention what's the significance of these acronyms ...and we are doing that!. Hope you will approve our site too. thanks, Acroman007 (talk) 07:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Tagalog from Libre OfficeMay I ask, why did you remove the reference to Tagalog from the Libre Office (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreOffice) article? Libre means free in Tagalog which is the main language in The Philippines. Ref: "03:09, 20 April 2011 SudoGhost (talk | contribs) m (17,385 bytes) (Undid revision 424961996 by 121.127.6.82 (talk) Libre in Tagalog comes from Spanish) (undo)" Ref: http://translate.google.com.ph/#tl%7Cen%7CLibre —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.127.6.82 (talk) 06:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Please see the talk page for the explanation. - SudoGhost (talk) 14:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]HiScruffy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.58.254 (talk) 14:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Scruffy believes in this company. *sniff* - SudoGhost (talk) 14:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Tiki Ghosn loss.Why do you keep changing your loss to Tiki to a win? The promoter has verified your loss and we have video of your loss. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.38.228 (talk) 16:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]It has been explained several times in numerous places. The source given for the Tiki Ghosn article shows him losing the fight, which is why it is being changed to match that source, and you have provided no sources or explanation for the changes. Second, the article itself shows 8 losses, and you changing that to a win makes the number of losses 7, making the entire page wrong. Third, it is not "my" loss. My username, SudoGhost, is from the Unix command Sudo, as I am an avid Linux user. It has nothing to do with this Genki Sudo. I was directed to the Tiki Ghosn page from a request at editor's assistance, until that point I had never even heard of those people. - SudoGhost (talk) 17:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Well the link to the video with Tiki's hand raised has been removed by you a few times.This is shown in the edit history. here it is again http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T763_D6SJ2o. I also contacted sherdog. They keep the data base for all MMA fights. They contacted the promoter and Ken Pavia. They have verified that this is a win and are in the process of changing this in their system. You seem to be the only person that is editing this page on both Tiki's and Genki's page. I can provide you with the emails to contact people that can confirm the fight. If you have no personal connection with this matter then you will get the confirmation you need and then leave the information alone. EDIT: i just looked at the logs again. You are not the one removing the link. How can this be resolved? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.38.228 (talk) 21:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]The section in which the YouTube link was placed in an inappropriate place for the link, the video is not necessary. I suggest you wait for sherdog to update the information on the page, and then update the article, mentioning that sherdog was updated in the edit summary. Otherwise the article does not match the source, making the entire article's integrity suspect. - SudoGhost (talk) 21:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Editing the Eurogentec PageHi boss, could you tell me why you've just reverted the modification i've done on the Eurogentec page ? The information was correct and referenced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.197.91.13 (talk) 07:19, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]See WP:PUFF - SudoGhost™ 07:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]INTJWhen you are reverting obvious vandalism (such as the removal of a sourced section) its not edit warring. cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 01:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]Capitol vs CapitalRe Confederate States of America spelling, edit reverts. Everywhere you see these days capital for capitol. Is capital Wiki standard now for capitol? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.246.177 (talk) 06:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]A capitol refers to a building, but when referring to a city it is spelled capital. - SudoGhost™ 07:03, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]Your signatureYour sig is unnacceptable. Change it please. Marchetti 77 (talk) 15:11, 23 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]And may I ask why? - SudoGhost™ 15:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]It's hard to read. That is unacceptable. Change it or I'll take you to ANI. Marchetti 77 (talk) 15:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]I wouldn't heed this troll account too much, Sudo.--Atlan (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] I'm an advocate of plainsigs myself, and would prefer our guidelines were more stringent, but I agree. This account (Marchetti) is a troll and almost certainly a sock as well. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 15:27, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] No comment on any other account, troll or otherwise, but I do think that putting your username in white text (which is what I see, unless I highlight your sig) makes life unnecessarily difficult for other users, and I would very much appreciate it if you'd change it. See my attempt above. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 17:42, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]YoYou following me around, bro? Marchetti 77 (talk) 15:25, 23 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]If by 'following' you mean watching two pages you happen to comment on, then yes. - SudoGhost™ 15:34, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]