User talk:Arlo Barnes: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DPL bot (talk | contribs)
dablink notification message (see the FAQ)
Tags: Reverted Disambiguation links added
OneClickArchived "Disambiguation link notification for April 26" to User talk:Arlo Barnes/Archive 1
Line 16: Line 16:
: It would be sort of unusual for a dabpage to have sources (edit: I can see from your edit history that I should just take your word on this) since it's the constituent pages that are making the factual assertions. What statements on [[draft:San Francisco, New Mexico]] should be cited? [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo James Barnes]] 20:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
: It would be sort of unusual for a dabpage to have sources (edit: I can see from your edit history that I should just take your word on this) since it's the constituent pages that are making the factual assertions. What statements on [[draft:San Francisco, New Mexico]] should be cited? [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo James Barnes]] 20:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
:: Okay, I think next step is to make the redlinked articles. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo James Barnes]] 21:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
:: Okay, I think next step is to make the redlinked articles. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo James Barnes]] 21:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for April 26 ==

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Earth First!]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Brandishing]].

([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 05:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:52, 26 April 2024

use 'new section' please.

On 21 February 2021 you made a comment at Talk:Antimatter weapon about refocusing the article on fiction. I just removed most of the real-life content as original research, which was largely unreferenced and for which I could not find a single reliable source. You can improve the finctional content now, provided you do not make an indiscriminate WP:IPC list. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

San Francisco, New Mexico moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to San Francisco, New Mexico. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be sort of unusual for a dabpage to have sources (edit: I can see from your edit history that I should just take your word on this) since it's the constituent pages that are making the factual assertions. What statements on draft:San Francisco, New Mexico should be cited? Arlo James Barnes 20:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I think next step is to make the redlinked articles. Arlo James Barnes 21:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]