User talk:Arsenikk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Arsenikk (talk | contribs) at 08:22, 16 September 2017 (add archive 6). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nomination of Douglas Martin (Bahá'í) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglas Martin (Bahá'í) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Martin (Bahá'í) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 20:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia categories named after aircraft has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedia categories named after aircraft, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Toro (food) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:V because there's no sources to support any of the claims made in the article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 19:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Kiser Barnes

Hello, Arsenikk,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kiser Barnes should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiser Barnes .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

menaechmi (talk) 14:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]