User talk:Bagumba

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Bagumba}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

This is Bagumba's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35: 14 days

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

User:Dreamkd

Edit warring and adding insignificant NBA G League showcase team honor at Paris Bass. Also just plain being rude. Could probably use someone uninvolved to help him understand how to work within and towards consensus. Rikster2 (talk) 19:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can expedite things with an appropriate edit warring warning. I also left an AGF warning.—Bagumba (talk) 00:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NBAhighlights

Are you able to list if a player led the NBA in three-point percentage during a certain year? Mandomanny313 (talk) 03:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mandomanny313: No, it's not on that list. It can be added to a bio's prose, if it's not already there.—Bagumba (talk) 03:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LaMelo Ball's All-Star status

So this video was put on the NBA website, and it shows LaMelo Ball as being a 1x All-Star. Keep in mind, this is the official NBA website, and this video was put out there by NBA front office. https://watch.nba.com/video/lamelo-ball-2021-22-highlights Could I add Ball's status to his page? Or should I wait? Mandomanny313 (talk) 20:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mandomanny313: If you are not seeing it anywhere else, WP:RSBREAKING seems to apply.—Bagumba (talk) 01:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News sources have caught onto this revelation from the NBA. Seems legitimate. https://thesportsrush.com/nba-news-did-the-nba-leak-lamelo-balls-all-star-status-fans-of-the-hornets-star-go-crazy-as-nba-tv-clip-confirms-that-he-has-acquired-one-of-the-reserve-spots-for-the-2022-all-star-game-2/ https://www.yardbarker.com/nba/articles/nba_tv_may_have_revealed_that_lamelo_ball_will_be_an_all_star_this_season/s1_16751_37115927 Mandomanny313 (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Casey Tiumalu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Los Angeles Express.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

Administrator changes

AustralianRupert • Cimon Avaro • Euryalus • Jehochman • Nunh-huh

28bytes

Bureaucrat changes

28bytes

Interface administrator changes

Evad37 • Galobtter

Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.

Technical news

The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

Arbitration

Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.

Miscellaneous

Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Brady records sources

Most of the records in question follow a 1 + 1 rule, as he owns most of the records in question for both regular season and post season individually. So by virtue of owning both, it is mathematically impossible to not own a combined record.

Most of those sources can be found in both the regular season record or post season record sections. I am not well versed in adding sources correctly, which is why I limit my edits to updating posted statistics, but I can provide links to several of them, and the numbers are backed through https://www.pro-football-reference.com/

Additional links to these pages help provide documentation for several of the records.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_National_Football_League_career_passing_completions_leaders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_National_Football_League_career_passing_touchdowns_leaders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NFL_players_by_games_played

Hope this helps, FrostCzar (talk) 10:07, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FrostCzar: I don't doubt this it's true, but if sources don't publish the combined stats or cite his records there, it's WP:OR.—Bagumba (talk) 10:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well they are far from original ideas or thoughts, and as I mentioned, many of them are sourced in the other sections or links already listed, so I can't agree it would be at all considered WP OR. But here are a couple more sources to get your request started. Hopefully that makes other peoples burdens a little lighter in getting the sources assembled.

https://www.buccaneers.com/news/bucs-overtime-win-buffalo-bills-tom-brady-all-time-nfl-record-data-crunch

https://boston.cbslocal.com/2022/01/29/retirement-tom-brady-dominated-sport-cant-be-dominated-appreciate-as-time-goes-on/

FrostCzar (talk) 10:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FrostCzar: Feel free to discuss with everyone back at the article talk. Something like sacks is not just "1+1", when he's #2 in regular season https://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/pass_sacked_career.htm —Bagumba (talk) 10:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.patspulpit.com/2022/2/1/22912323/tom-brady-retires-owner-more-than-a-100-nfl-records FrostCzar (talk) 10:49, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FrostCzar: I generally stay clear of SBNation for reliability (notable exceptions like The Ringer), mostly amateurish fan blogs. WP:NFL might differ from me.—Bagumba (talk) 10:55, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I won't argue with your point on SBNation, but can we at least agree to update the numbers to factually correct numbers to help prevent people from creating and posting future blogs and articles that will include incorrect information based on old numbers by lazy writers coming to wiki? That was my main goal in attempting to make the original edit. Updating the sources and talking to the source material can certainly be something worth talking about in the talk page if it must be, but at least have the correct statistics up in the meantime to prevent misinformation, would be helpful. FrostCzar (talk) 11:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]