User talk:BilCat: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 750824816 by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) noted |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
{{NoBracketBot}} |
{{NoBracketBot}} |
||
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
||
== Don't ever delete my contributions == |
|||
I've added "Stargate sg1" to the warp drive page. You've removed it. Don't destroy my contribution. If you've got some ownership complex or whatever possessive obsession with certain pages then maybe you need to move on. Wikipedia isn't your own personal toy for you to have a turf war mentality and delete other people's contributions. Unless you own wikipedia... Do you? No. So don't delete my Stargate sg1 contribution to the warp drive page while leaving behind "wall-e" and other obscure 70s no name nonsense shows. Warp drive features thought-out Stargate sg1 separately from the Stargate wormhole technology itself. It's on all goauld, asgard, ori, wraith and replreplicant ships with lots of warp tech details and specs etc so that's why I've added the longest running sci-fi in human history, Stargate sg1, to the warp drive page. Stop arbitrarily deleting stuff based on your subjective biased views. That is all. |
|||
== Just to let you know == |
== Just to let you know == |
||
Revision as of 23:31, 21 November 2016
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This user is somewhat active on Wikipedia, and limits his activities to a small range of pages and mostly non-contentious discussions. There may be periods in which the user is not active due to life issues.
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
 |
|
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:BilCat. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Don't ever delete my contributions
I've added "Stargate sg1" to the warp drive page. You've removed it. Don't destroy my contribution. If you've got some ownership complex or whatever possessive obsession with certain pages then maybe you need to move on. Wikipedia isn't your own personal toy for you to have a turf war mentality and delete other people's contributions. Unless you own wikipedia... Do you? No. So don't delete my Stargate sg1 contribution to the warp drive page while leaving behind "wall-e" and other obscure 70s no name nonsense shows. Warp drive features thought-out Stargate sg1 separately from the Stargate wormhole technology itself. It's on all goauld, asgard, ori, wraith and replreplicant ships with lots of warp tech details and specs etc so that's why I've added the longest running sci-fi in human history, Stargate sg1, to the warp drive page. Stop arbitrarily deleting stuff based on your subjective biased views. That is all.
Just to let you know
This "account", whom you correctly reverted yesterday, is now a CU confirmed sock.[1] Thought you might be interested. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 16:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- I thought it was a sock when I reverted it. Thanks for letting me know. - BilCat (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
2K12 Kub
Hello BilCat or talk page watchers, please could you take a look at this edit to 2K12 Kub? It was closely followed by another edit from a different editor, which you reverted. But I am wondering if there may actually have been problems with both edits. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 18:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- That edit on Nov. 1 apparently included sources. The source for the first paragraph had an OK source, but the second one used a forum page as a source (tagged it). I suggest asking at Talk:2K12 Kub and maybe WT:MILHIST for more help. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
The Royal Canadian Air Cadets operate six 182s, so it is true, but far too small a fleet to make it worth mentioning. - Ahunt (talk) 12:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
caravan
Come on, you're a little heavy with the revert button :) --Marc Lacoste (talk) 12:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Seriously? The Aircraft Project prefers to use the templates over tables, major airliners being the general exception. Please discuss it first. - BilCat (talk) 12:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Civility Barnstar |
| Thank you for clearing up something I didn't know about! JustAGuyOnWikipedia (talk) 18:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC) |
IP sock puppet back at mini-14 article.
Just an FYI Springee (talk) 20:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Numbers of AIP Submarines
BilCat, I'm the one that added the numbers of each submarine type to the table on the AIP Submarines page. I think that information is helpful because most of those platforms only offer AIP as an option and so I find the number using AIP helpful separate from the total number of each submarine type produced (AIP + non-AIP) that is listed on each submarine's main page. There is also the distinction between those submarines that were designed for AIP from the start, and those that were retrofit, and the notes help disambiguate which submarines were retrofit. If you disagree with the format or citations let me know and I'll address them, but please don't roll back the information. It was all pulled from the information on the main wikipedia page for each submarine type. Thanks! -Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBMilnes (talk • contribs) 20:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- WP articles cannot be used to source other articles. Cite reliable sources. - BilCat (talk) 20:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Okay I will add sources. Please don't re-roll the page back while I'm working on it. -Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBMilnes (talk • contribs) 20:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Okay, I have about half of them. I will keep working on this tonight and over the next couple of days. Thanks! --TBMilnes (talk) 21:36, 21 November 2016 (UTC)