User talk:ChristianandJericho

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ChristianandJericho (talk | contribs) at 00:01, 21 September 2011 (→‎blocked). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I am currently: Offline.

Welcome, seriously.

I wasn't joking at all. It's good to see a rebel with a brain. Not that you'd be much of a rebel at all, just doing the right thing your own way. Unusual, eccentric even. But not wrong. Like I said we all make mistakes, your doing what you believe is right, and you'll be more and more of a success and leave your critics behind, you are happy to learn, admit when your wrong, be civilized, people can't justifiably ask for more than that. Penyulap talk 08:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ChristianandJericho, thanks for the thankyou, (it was me who did the g for a d when I was logged out accidentally, it does that sometimes). I see SudoGhost is being friendly. I reckon thats cool, he's a top bloke. I'm not just saying that because he awarded me a barnstar, well, thats not all of the reason, lol. He's good. Anyhow, while I always think it's good to stick to your guns and be defiant with idiots you don't like, I always try to follow my friends advice, as part of being their friend. That's cool too. Personally I think you got a good deal with his offer. I've been adopted by a nice bloke, but he's not SudoGhost :) ...well my mentor is cool too. I think everyone needs a mentor, like in star wars. No matter how experienced I get I'll always need a mentor. Sooner or later I should be able to adopt someone too. I look forward to helping out. Penyulap talk 11:45, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hey, ChristianandJericho. I see that you're looking for an experienced editor to adopt you, and I'd be more than happy to do so! Just let me know if that sounds alright to you. Swarm u / t 20:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship

As per this comment, I've set up a subpage here that includes some temporary guidelines that I would ask you to agree to beforehand, so that we can work through each of the concerns addressed at the AN/I discussion one by one. Please check out User:SudoGhost/Mentor and let me know. Thank you. - SudoGhost 06:48, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope the mentoring is helpful. You have, unfortunately, had a bit of a rough time so far on Wikipedia, but I see no reason why you shouldn't be able to get past it all and have a better time in the future. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've set up a talk page here specifically for discussing the mentorship, please visit that talk page. Thank you. - SudoGhost 09:16, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. SudoGhost has let me know that they will not be able to continue mentoring you (they're planning to take a wikibreak), and they've asked me to take over. So if that sounds fine to you, we can finally move forward. :) Swarm u / t 15:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And I'll continue to watchlist this page, if it is OK. There may be a need for writing advice. Or my adminly powers may be handy.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Porn

Hey, ChristianandJericho. While we will get the issue sorted out, for now, please remove the WikiProject Porn userbox from your userpage, and while you're at it, remove the "doesn't give a fuck about your opinion" userbox as well (in accordance with the guidelines you accepted). Swarm u / t 17:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

C&J, I've removed the PP infobox from your user page and also taken your name off the list of editors at the project page, because any editor claiming to be both 13 years old and an editor of pornography topic areas is disruptive to the project, whether or not such edits are being (or should be, or can be) made. There are other things that need to be settled as to your edits here, but either way, please do not put back the infobox (or anything like it) and don't re-add your name to the project list. If you do, they'll only be removed again and you'll most likely be blocked for at least a week, maybe two. Gwen Gale (talk) 18:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I wouldn't like to butt in here, but do you seriously think you're going to get anything productive out of threatening him for wanting to contribute on porn articles?--Deely1 19:22, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not what happened. To learn what did happen, you might read my post (above) again, carefully. Gwen Gale (talk) 19:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I'm reading it...--Deely1 20:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
One can also read more of my thoughts on this here. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, ChristianandJericho. You have new messages at User talk:Swarm/Mentor.
Message added 20:08, 20 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Swarm u / t 20:08, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

ChristianandJericho (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I should not be blocked as I AM in inactive member, also I have made over 900 contributions to wikipedia, I ask that the blocking admin not review my case by another admin instead ChristianandJericho 23:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I should not be blocked as I AM in inactive member, also I have made over 900 contributions to wikipedia, I ask that the blocking admin not review my case by another admin instead [[User:ChristianandJericho|Christian]][[User talk:ChristianandJericho|and]][[Special:Contributions/ChristianandJericho|Jericho]] 23:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I should not be blocked as I AM in inactive member, also I have made over 900 contributions to wikipedia, I ask that the blocking admin not review my case by another admin instead [[User:ChristianandJericho|Christian]][[User talk:ChristianandJericho|and]][[Special:Contributions/ChristianandJericho|Jericho]] 23:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I should not be blocked as I AM in inactive member, also I have made over 900 contributions to wikipedia, I ask that the blocking admin not review my case by another admin instead [[User:ChristianandJericho|Christian]][[User talk:ChristianandJericho|and]][[Special:Contributions/ChristianandJericho|Jericho]] 23:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

blocked

I've blocked you indefinitely owing to disruption, along with your behaviour[1][2] after agreeing to these editing restrictions. You can work with your mentor towards getting unblocked, or post an unblock request. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:58, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that older editors have to agree with a indef block? --ChristianandJericho 00:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]