User talk:Codename Lisa: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Codename Lisa (talk | contribs)
Reverted 2 edits by Warren (talk): Reverted appeal to ridicule.
Undid revision 817112226 by Codename Lisa (talk) No, it's an attempt at levity given that you're frustrated with the issue.
Line 65: Line 65:
:Best regards,<br/>[[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa#top|talk]]) 06:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
:Best regards,<br/>[[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa#top|talk]]) 06:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
::{{u|Codename Lisa}} - I think I will leave it at that before I get a headache from all these software classifications--it's not too big of a problem anyways. 😊 Thanks, – <span style="color: purple">[[User:Batreeq|Batreeq]]</span> <sup> ([[User talk:Batreeq|<span style="color: green;">Talk</span>]]) <span style="color: orange;">([[Special:Contributions/Batreeq|Contribs]])</span></sup> 06:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
::{{u|Codename Lisa}} - I think I will leave it at that before I get a headache from all these software classifications--it's not too big of a problem anyways. 😊 Thanks, – <span style="color: purple">[[User:Batreeq|Batreeq]]</span> <sup> ([[User talk:Batreeq|<span style="color: green;">Talk</span>]]) <span style="color: orange;">([[Special:Contributions/Batreeq|Contribs]])</span></sup> 06:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
:::This issue reminds me of [https://www.andertoons.com/word/cartoon/5005/were-really-more-of-department this]. <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 06:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:34, 26 December 2017

Welcome, Codename Lisa!

Hello, Codename Lisa, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Mr. Stradivarius, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  How to edit a page
  Help pages
  Tutorial
  How to write a great article
  Manual of Style
  Fun stuff...
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Mr. Stradivarius 18:59, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heddwch ac ewyllys da

   Compliments of the season
Wishing you all the best for 2018 — good health, sufficient wealth, peace and contentment 
 Cheers! ‑ ‑ Gareth Griffith‑Jones The Welsh Buzzard ‑ ‑ 19:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Windows components template

Hello,

I noticed you reverted this edit and would like to mention that application software is a more precise article to link to and is still accurate by Microsoft's definition (referenced in your edit summary) as proven by the first sentence "An application program (app or application for short) is a computer program..." :) Computer program seems to cover more of the backend information about programs.

Thank you for your efforts,

Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 05:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Batreeq
This topic is somehow cursed. No matter what I do, there are others who disagree. The application software article explains its subject as "a computer program designed to perform a group of coordinated functions, tasks, or activities for the benefit of the user". This is in direct contrast to "a computer program designed to perform a group of [...] for the benefit of the computer". The latter is called utility software. And "Windows To Go", "Phone Companion" and "Mobility Center" are utility software.
Fortunately, we do not have this problem in the mobile territory. There, "app" is the dominant word. For now, do what you must. I try not to contest.
Also, the place of discussing content is the corresponding content talk page; in this case, it is Template talk:Microsoft Windows components. The correct course of action is to start the discussion in the correct place and then notify the interest party via echo notification or user talk page messages. If you don't do this, you might run into problems with DRN and MedCom.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 06:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Codename Lisa - I think I will leave it at that before I get a headache from all these software classifications--it's not too big of a problem anyways. 😊 Thanks, – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 06:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This issue reminds me of this. Warren -talk- 06:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]