User talk:Crum375: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:30, 20 June 2007

Archives

Picture of the day

Monteleone chariot

Artifact credit: unknown Etruscan sculptor; photographed by the Rogers Fund and the Metropolitan Museum of Art

User:Wassermann

He's still busy adding Jew categories: [1] Jayjg ^(talk) 05:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And more [2]. Jayjg ^(talk) 06:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The golden rule of Wikipedia is: "If the rules prevent you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore them" (WP:IGNORE). Crum and Jayjg: I'm IMPROVING Wikipedia and you both choose to block me? Talk about rampant administrator abuse...I'm most definitely being mistreated here in your not-so-subtle campaign to silence any and all opposition to your oftentimes unchecked administrator powers (nevermind that I was trying to point out and prevent the massive amount of reversions of valid material that was occurring here, not to mention the upcoming attempt to make Wikipedia "Judenfrei"). That being said, I now propose a new rule to fit this situation: WP:If high-level administrators disagree with regular editors that are trying to improve Wikipedia they can block them using any means necessary, including unethical ones. --172.166.34.87 03:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. :-p SlimVirgin ^(talk)

OH GOLLY! I continue to improve, organize, and clean up Wikipedia unabated [3] (yes, I'm reporting myself to save you all the trouble). So what's next...a Wiki-flogging? ;) In all seriousness though, please unblock me (I'd much rather be using my proper username). I am doing nothing wrong, my constructive and helpful edits from these IP addresses are not a big deal and are entirely appropriate since I have been inappropriately blocked, and I can assure you all my past flirtations with incivility and personal attacks are just that...in the past. --172.164.80.216 16:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sharp edit summary

Sorry, my last edit summary on The Holocaust came out harsher than I intended, and a bit abrasive. Ignore it, if you don't mind, and just look at the edit. Thanks. Jd2718 02:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

???

The 'big deal' is that we unfortunately have an infestation of Trojan and sock admin and would-be-admin accounts, and they typically rely on open proxy to carry out their schemes ... ... Crum375 17:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch, man. Seriously... ouch. An "infestation"... wow. I've seen some massive generalizations from single isolated incidents in my time, but that one really was something – Gurch 21:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 :And more [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/172.163.44.227]. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 06:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
-::The golden rule of Wikipedia is: "If the [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|rules]] prevent you from improving or maintaining [[Wikipedia]], '''ignore them'''" ([[WP:IGNORE]]). Crum and Jayjg: I'm '''''IMPROVING''''' Wikipedia and you both choose to block me? Talk about rampant [[WP:ROUGE|administrator abuse]]...I'm most definitely being mistreated here in your not-so-subtle campaign to silence any and all opposition to your oftentimes unchecked administrator powers (nevermind that I was trying to point out and prevent the massive amount of reversions of valid material that was occurring here, not to mention the upcoming attempt to make Wikipedia "[[Judenrein]]"). That being said, I now propose a new rule to fit this situation: [[WP:If high-level administrators disagree with regular editors that are trying to improve Wikipedia they can block them using any means necessary, including unethical ones]].  --[[User:172.166.34.87|172.166.34.87]] 03:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
+::The golden rule of Wikipedia is: "If the [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|rules]] prevent you from improving or maintaining [[Wikipedia]], '''ignore them'''" ([[WP:IGNORE]]). Crum and Jayjg: I'm '''''IMPROVING''''' Wikipedia and you both choose to block me? Talk about rampant [[WP:ROUGE|administrator abuse]]...I'm most definitely being mistreated here in your not-so-subtle campaign to silence any and all opposition to your oftentimes unchecked administrator powers (nevermind that I was trying to point out and prevent the massive amount of reversions of valid material that was occurring here, not to mention the upcoming attempt to make Wikipedia "[[Judenfrei]]"). That being said, I now propose a new rule to fit this situation: [[WP:If high-level administrators disagree with regular editors that are trying to improve Wikipedia they can block them using any means necessary, including unethical ones]].  --[[User:172.166.34.87|172.166.34.87]] 03:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 :::Thanks for the suggestion. :-p [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup>
+::::''OH GOLLY!''  I continue to improve, organize, and clean up Wikipedia unabated [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/172.164.80.216] (yes, I'm reporting myself to save you all the trouble). So what's next...a Wiki-flogging? ;) In all seriousness though, please unblock me (I'd much rather be using my proper username). I am doing nothing wrong, my constructive and helpful edits from these IP addresses are not a big deal and are entirely appropriate since I have been inappropriately blocked, and I can assure you all my past flirtations with incivility and personal attacks are just that...in the past.  --[[User:172.164.80.216|172.164.80.216]] 16:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 == Sharp edit summary ==