User talk:Dematt: Difference between revisions
→Treatment techniques: new section |
request |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The [[Talk:Chiropractic#Treatment techniques]] section needs an expert on the subject. I hope you are interested in helping out in reaching [[WP:GA]] status for [[chiropractic]]. This is possible with the help of an expert. [[User:QuackGuru|QuackGuru]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|talk]]) 23:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC) |
The [[Talk:Chiropractic#Treatment techniques]] section needs an expert on the subject. I hope you are interested in helping out in reaching [[WP:GA]] status for [[chiropractic]]. This is possible with the help of an expert. [[User:QuackGuru|QuackGuru]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|talk]]) 23:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Request== |
|||
Hiya, at the pseudosciences list, I realize that it's a hot topic, but unless there's a strong consensus to do so on the talkpage, it's probably not a good idea to be removing sourced information like this.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts&diff=262238114&oldid=262237656] You may wish to ''modify'' the information, but the citations themselves should probably be left in place. Thanks, --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 04:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:23, 6 January 2009
|
| 4/20 - 9/21 2006 |
| 2 |
Invitation to CfD Category:Pseudoskeptic Target Discussion
I noticed that you have edited in related areas within WP, and so thought you might have an interest in this discussion.-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Treatment techniques
The Talk:Chiropractic#Treatment techniques section needs an expert on the subject. I hope you are interested in helping out in reaching WP:GA status for chiropractic. This is possible with the help of an expert. QuackGuru (talk) 23:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Request
Hiya, at the pseudosciences list, I realize that it's a hot topic, but unless there's a strong consensus to do so on the talkpage, it's probably not a good idea to be removing sourced information like this.[1] You may wish to modify the information, but the citations themselves should probably be left in place. Thanks, --Elonka 04:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)