User talk:Durova

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I'll reply here if you post here. I have recently changed my volunteer commitment per these parameters.
Start a new talk topic.

File:Neandertalwithlaptop.jpg

Here in Web 2.0 I've met a lot of Humans 1.0. Disclaimer.

Archived talk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

Bluemarine

Could you shed some light on Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/bluemarine_(2nd)#User:bluemarine — Rlevse • Talk • 22:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Is there something that needs to be said here? He isn't blocked anymore. I lifted that block because he explained through offsite communication that the statement was not a legal threat toward Wikipedia or any Wikipedian. The context had been unclear at the time when I originally acted. Durova^Charge! 06:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Just a clarification. The legal action was in no way directed toward Wikipedia, but toward MSNBC and Youtube.Matt Sanchez 20:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

User:Dbromage

Durova, out of courtesy I'm informing that I have mentioned you as part of evidence in action against user Dbromage. The user is suspected of utilizing at least two sock puppets, and there is also evidence of meat puppetry. The user is also vainly awarded himself a barnstar. I was unsure were my complaint should go so I have put it [1] and here [2]Tezza1 15:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

I haven't confirmed your conclusions, bear in mind. No prejudice either way; I just haven't given this a look in a while. Durova^Charge! 17:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Suspected sock puppet of Dbromage, Thin Arthur has responded to my allegations. Please see Suspected_sock_puppets/Dbromage for his response. This user has also taken action against me here [3]. Tezza1 12:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

need for endorsement of community sanction on Sadi

The reason that action is there is because there currently is no block. Jehochman blocked, Phsychim62 unblocked, Sarah blocked, DragonflySixtyseven unblocked, and that's where it sits. If the conclusion is that Sadi should be blocked, it has to actively done at this point.Kww 20:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Then there isn't any community ban and the Committee could impose its own. Durova^Charge! 20:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

In Remembrance...

--nat ^{Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?!} 01:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Durova^Charge! 01:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi

E-mail sent. Ral315 » 18:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Replied. Durova^Charge! 00:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

The Null Device SSP

The Null Device posted on your talk page denying the prior Check User case you brought against The Null Device. There is a new SSP case against The Null Device, here. -- Jreferee t/c 20:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. As my summary at that checkuser request explains, I considered several plausible scenarios at the time when I filed it, some of which might have cleared The Null Device of suspicion. Durova^Charge! 02:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Triple Crown nomination

• User:Aboutmovies
  • DYK: Oregon Coast Range (and many more)
  • GA: Provisional Government of Oregon (and several more)
  • FC: Oregon State Capitol (FA)

Aboutmovies is the champion of all things DYK/GA/FA for WikiProject Oregon and deserves this award (with Oregon White Oak Cluster :)). Let me know if you need more/better proof. Thanks! Katr67 22:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Awesome, coming right up! Durova^Charge! 02:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Another Oregon triple crown nom

• User:EngineerScotty
  • DYK: Rose Quarter (and several more)
  • GA: Oregon wine (and several more)
  • FC: New Carissa (FA)

EngineerScotty whips up fully cited, lengthy articles and makes it look easy. As a mere WikiGnome, I stand in awe of his powers of article creation. Katr67 03:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

It's been a while! Glad to hear he's doing great work in article space. Cheers, Durova^Charge! 03:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

You're definitely an expert Wikipedian

I've seen your name around, here and there. AfD, maybe, VP, possibly. I know you're dedicated to the project, and the five pillars, so I'd like your opinions on an essay I'm trying to resurrect. I think we can give scientific experts some amount of due recognition, but not without first recognizing the true Wikipedia experts such as yourself and the people you give awards to (such as EngineerScotty, which is how I came to your page in the first place). TIA. Can I be Frank? ^{(Talk to me!)} 04:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

How about opening that for a content-related request for comment and listing it on the community bulletin board at the community portal? Durova^Charge! 04:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Now this is why I wouldn't call myself an expert editor, because I'm not familiar with the community bulletin board, or how to list things there. Though I'm sure I'll figure it out if I click around long enough. ;) Can I be Frank? ^{(Talk to me!)} 00:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Here you go.[4] Durova^Charge! 00:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the triple crown!

Good to hear from you again. WRT adminship, I'll have to decline at this point--I've been busy editing articles and ignoring meta stuff, and after a wikispammer called my home phone number a while back to complain, my wife insists that I stay off RC patrol and such.  :) (Such happens when you leave your real name on your homepage and your number is in the phone book...) At any rate, thanks! --EngineerScotty 05:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

RfA stuff

Ok - many thanks first. However there is sense in which I'd have preferred to see others with the rights helping out on the blacklist. A. B. is obvious (& I think weakening) however equally Siobhan is a quality worker who I am trying to persuade... If you are interested then maybe comments might help? If I can help with anything let me know, cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

If you see someone who looks like a good candidate for admin coaching, send them my way. I specialize, so people who want to do WP:CSD wouldn't be well placed with me. I'm particularly interested in sleuths and people who'll help run WP:COIN and WP:SSP. Cheers, Durova^Charge! 15:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I appreciate the retraction. I understand where your coming from as the recent level of vandalism has taken a very different turn than the early vandalism the project experienced. It used to be someone posted "poopyface", some bad word, or changed a random fact and they left. Lately, the level of disruption includes sleepers, intricate long term plots, trust abusers, etc and the admin response has been ratcheted up. My concern is that innocents are being caught up and that puts a black mark on the whole project as there have been more and more "I got banned for editing X" posts growing on forums around the Internet. Sleepers are always a problem but they will be caught eventually as they will want to continue the behavior that caused their main account to be banned (the very definition of a sleeper). In the mean time, if they do contribute positively to the project, the project wins.

I think your proposal is a decent one compared to the alternatives. I still don't like the secret evidence thing but it is the lesser of two evils. I am going to go back to vandal patrol now as I need to rethink my contributions to the admin side of this whole thing. I just put my first created from scratch article out and want to keep improving the project's view of my little corner of the world. Cheers! spryde | talk 20:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, there's a fairly small but active cluster of people who cause most of the headaches in this regard. And it's never been uncommon for those disruptive people who get banned from Wikipedia to raise vocal complaints in other fora. Again, you have my apologies for the mistake. I'll do my best to learn from it. Regards, Durova^Charge! 21:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Railpage Australia

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Railpage Australia. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Railpage Australia/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Railpage Australia/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 22:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring

I seem to be getting into an edit war over Poi (juggling) with with B9 hummingbird hovering. I'm not sure if you are the right person to ask, but I would very much appreciate it if you would look at what is going on here and give me some direction - Geronimo20 00:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Have you tried an article content request for comment? WP:RFC is the link. Best wishes, Durova^Charge! 00:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

ANI dicussion

Hi, Durova: if you happen to have some time and interest, I'd love it if you'd pop over to this discussion about some edit warring users I'm trying to handle. I've been trying to work on a community sanction for these users, but I'm quickly finding that they aren't too willing to do this. The last recourse I can think of short of ArbCom is to ask another editor to have a look at it, so that's what I'm doing now. If you're not interested or can't, I understand, but I thought I'd at least try. Thanks. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 18:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

The WP:CEM dilemma: one editor objects to identical sanctions as false equivalence. Stakes everything on the distinction. Might be too complex for the community to solve without their agreement. If it's been through formal DR already, could be a candidate for arbitration. Durova^Charge! 18:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, thanks a lot for the input. That gives me an idea of where to go from here. I think I will let this sit for part of today. If no one's come up with any Solomon-like wisdom to solve this by evening PST, I'll make a request to the Committee. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 19:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

If you have a moment

User:One Night In Hackney has done a lot of spade work with regards to a possible sockpuppet account being used to get around not one, but two ArbCom remedies (The Troubles and the Great Irish Famine ArbCom cases). Would you look at the evidence Here and tell me if you agree with him (and of course, myself) SirFozzie 21:19, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Looks like someone got to that. Durova^Charge! 22:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Ome Henk vandal

Here are two IPs:

217.233.230.136, blocked for 'legal threats and general trolling' [5]

and 217.233.221.43, blocked for vandalism [6] Michaelbusch 23:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Maybe these will turn out to be throwaway addresses. If problems continue I'll apply longer blocks. Please keep me in the loop. Durova^Charge! 23:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

The IPs all belong to a server farm owned by Deutsche Telekom, so I've requested that the semi-protection on Ome Henk be restored. Michaelbusch 23:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

IP block

This is an open proxy (a specialist subject of mine!) according to Wikipedia:Open proxy detection. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eyrian

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eyrian. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eyrian/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eyrian/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Anthøny 20:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Callmebc oopsie

You said in WP:AN that User talk:Callmebc protection was reduced to semi. I see a "source" tab there. I think you deprotected his User page instead, perhaps due to confusion involving his redirect to Talk. Thought you might want to give it another tap. (SEWilco 22:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC))

Oh, you're offline. I'll ask someone else. (SEWilco 22:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC))

One more comment about Greg and you.

One more comment about Greg and you. Self-promotional half-truths that are at best misleading, and according to higher ethical standards constitute lies, are so common in the media as to be literally unremarkable; while at organizations with exacting standards of validity/truth such as what Wikipedia aspires to be it is a cause of great concern. Greg's self-promotional misleading statements at Wikipedia are cause to exile him from Wikipedia because his efforts here are incompatible with the aims and goals of a NPOV encyclopedia; but his similar efforts in talking to the media are par for the course in that venue. Greg has shown too little understanding that Wikipedia is not a part of "the media" as he understands it; while you seem not to distinguish between his self promotion on Wikipedia and off of it. "Well, that's just Greg promoting himself again" is better than "Greg is lying about Wikipedia!" Nuance and savoir-faire are always useful. WAS 4.250 22:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Apologies I haven't followed up on specifics faster. I actually hadn't anticipated the discussion would go on this long and it's something I'd rather not dwell on, but as I have the chance I'll get to that. At the moment (to be candid) I'm finishing a handmade present for a little girl's birthday. I'll be baking peanut butter cookies for her soon. It's much more satisfying. :) Durova^Charge! 02:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

I understand. I like reading Douglas Adams' "Mostly Harmless" better than dwelling on Greg ...

Tricia began to feel that the world was conspiring against her. She knew that this was a perfectly normal way to feel after an overnight flight going east, when you suddenly have a whole other mysteriously threatening day to deal with for which you are not the least bit prepared. But still.

There were marks on her lawn.

She didn't really care about marks on her lawn very much.

Marks on her lawn could go and take a running jump as far as she was concerned. It was Saturday morning. She had just got home from New York feeling tired, crabby and paranoid, and all she wanted to do was go to bed with the radio on quietly and gradually fall asleep to the sound of Ned Sherrin being terribly clever about something. But Eric Bartlett was not going to let her get away with not making a thorough inspection of the marks. Eric was the old gardener who came in from the village on Saturday mornings to poke around at her garden with a stick. He didn't believe in people coming in from New York first thing in the morning. Didn't hold with it. Went against nature. He believed in virtually everything else, though.

'Probably them space aliens,' he said, bending over and prod-ding at the edges of the small indentations with his stick. 'Hear a lot about space aliens these days. I expect it's them.'

'Do you?' said Tricia, looking furtively at her watch. Ten minutes, she reckoned. Ten minutes she'd be able to stay standing up. Then she would simply keel over, whether she was in her bedroom or still out here in the garden. That was if she just had to stand. If she also had to nod intelligently and say 'Do you?' from time to time, it might cut it down to five.

'Oh yes,' said Eric. 'They come down here, land on your lawn, and then buzz off again, sometimes with your cat. WAS 4.250 08:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Your block

I was wondering what was happening :D. Seems there is no longer an alert asking you if you are sure to be willing to block yourself. -- lucasbfr ^talk 03:50, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Teehee...trying to multitask... ;) Durova^Charge! 03:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

SEO

I've read a lot of your SEO articles. I think you've done a great job explaining Wikipedia to the SEO world. I do think you have a conflict of interest with regard to conflict of interest policies (funny, that), but, it's all in the open, and that's sufficient for me. Rklawton 04:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

How do you reason that I have a conflict of interest there? I don't make any money from the column and it cost me money to explain Wikipedia to the audience at the conference. When I started doing the column I acted pseudonymously in order to avoid any appearance of seeking personal gain, but Kohs and his buddies insisted on "outing" my actual identity. So I put it in the byline to reduce that hassle, and now he tries to insinuate that I'm on the make. I view this as outreach - a proactive effort to prevent COI, spam, and related problems before they occur. If the idea that this constitues a COI gains traction, then that would effectively exclude everyone who knows Wikipedia site standards and policies well enough to explain them from communicating to the public in other venues. That situation would serve the ends of a handful of banned users at the expense of everybody else. If there's some angle here I haven't considered then please explain it. Durova^Charge! 04:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I assumed you were paid to write those articles and that you are an SEO/marketing consultant. However, I'm more than happy to eat my words (it's an acquired taste, but I'm used to it). Rklawton 04:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I'd love to see more experienced Wikipedians publishing offsite, actually. The public is hungry for information about Wikipedia and most of them don't know how to navigate this site and learn about things that seem obvious to you and me. Last month I was in contact with a Harvard undergraduate who is planning to write her thesis about Wikipedia and the dialog was a real eye opener for both of us: obviously she's intelligent and she has no reason to conceal her level of understanding, yet she was finding it difficult to transition from a reader of this site to an analyst of its dynamics. A lot of this site's structure is counterintuitive. We're the experts on Wikipedia and most of use learn a thing or two about writing by the time we have a five digit edit count. Durova^Charge! 05:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

My first attempts at understanding Wikipedia comprised vandalizing an article one of my students cited in order to "prove" to her that Wikipedia was not reliable. I'm sure you can guess the subsequent chain of events. Rklawton 05:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Awesome, although please tell me you teach junior high school? Durova^Charge! 05:41, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Until I implemented an explicit ban on referencing Wikipedia, I had college juniors and seniors citing it in their papers. Raymond Arritt 05:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I taught MIS at Western Illinois University. It was a great lesson for the whole class, though. Rklawton 05:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

(Sigh). In ninth grade my English teacher gave the class a stern lecture about the proper use of encyclopedias and forbade us from citing one ever again. More high school freshman classes ought to be like that. Durova^Charge! 18:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Imperial triple crown and DYKs

• I'm not quite there yet, but I was wondering, can I submit a succesful DYK article that I expanded from a stub, but did not outright create? Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 05:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC).

If you got the DYK from it, sure. Wikipedia has tiny little stubs on so many topics that I'll even encourage this, in order to get more substantive articles. Cheers, Durova^Charge! 05:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, great, I had an idea for something but I wanted to check with you before submitting it, which is a bit of a way off anyways. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 05:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC).

• On an unrelated note, I dropped you an email. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 05:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC).

Help with Help

I think the user help interface could use a serious makeover. We should accommodate the user's perspective. Here's a stab at the short list:

• I want to find information (anyone)
• I want to fix something I read (very basic markup)
• I want to write an article about Wikipedia (journalists)
• I want to write an article for Wikipedia (advanced markup, pillars, policies)
• I want my students to learn about Wikipedia (professors, teachers)
• I want to make money using Wikipedia (opportunists)
• I want to vandalize Wikipedia (vandals)

Each link (whatever the final list) should send users along a path tailored to his or her particular type of interest. Thoughts? Rklawton 05:47, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Interesting. Past the first two levels things get quite complicated. Durova^Charge! 05:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, at that point it's more of a web of destinations. I'm just proposing perspective-oriented roadmap. To quote Donald Sutherland's character in Kelly's Heroes "I don't know what makes them go, baby. I just drive them." That is, I don't need to read about pillars when all I want to do is correct a fact (etc). Would it be useful for me to expand this draft into the 2nd level? Rklawton 06:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

In my experience a huge amount of self-selection occurs. Most people can't navigate on their own from there because they get overwhelmed. Wikipedians tend to think it's self-evident because we're the ones who passed through that natural filter. Durova^Charge! 06:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. Hence the need for various roadmaps. Unless Wikipedia benefits from this self-selection. However, I don't think it does. Rklawton 06:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

In my experience, most of them stall at the first link I show them and need to be led by the hand. These are bright people - maybe some brains are wired to get around over here and others aren't. Durova^Charge! 06:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

And some people wouldn't read instructions no matter how well written. I started reading directions when I took up skydiving as a sport. Rklawton 14:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

:) I went skydiving once. I had just walked away from a pretty good job with a bright future in order to move across the country and try a monkish existence as a graduate student. My one luxury was a Harley-Davidson Sportster (it got 50 miles to the gallon, I saved $1000 a year on insurance and $500 on parking fees by using it instead of a car, and Harleys seldom depreciate - so even that wasn't so much a luxury). The day after I bought the thing I rode it up the coast highway, taking hairpin turns through cliffside fog until I turned inland and stopped at Hollister. I figured jumping out of an airplane was the least risky decision I made that month. Durova^Charge! 18:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Bus stop

Hi. I propose reopening Bus stop's case, now at AN because the CSN has closed. I would like him to have one last chance. I would like to propose he is invited to return with a probation period of six months. Three months with no edits to any Judaism-related articles and a further three months of "open" editing. Evidence of bad-faith edit-warring or gross incivility during that probationary period should result in a permanent site ban. Before I posted at AN I wanted to discuss the idea with you, and if you approve the idea in principle (we need not go into the detail of the measures here, but leave that for AN discussion) I would also raise it with one or two others involved in the original CSN debate. Yours as ever. --Dweller 11:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:TURNIP. I did my best to bring him back under probationary agreements and he repaid that effort by sending nasty e-mails to me and about me for quite some time afterward. No good deed goes unpunished, and somebody might as well explain to him that the proper Yiddish slur for me is not putz but shiksa. In spite of that, I'm still willing to extend the standard offer: six month waiting period from the date of his last troublemaking. If nothing happens in the interim, talk to me next March. Durova^Charge! 17:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

User:NearestAvailableNewt

Don't understand why you blocked Newt. He is a second account of mine, but I don't think I've ever used him in a way that breaches WP:SOCK. I'm not too worried: I can just stop using the account, but I'm curious what the reason for the block was since he hasn't edited at all in over a month, and even then I can't see any really bad edits. AndyJones 18:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

It showed some characteristics similar to a series of disruptive sockpuppets I'd been investigating. Thanks for disclosing that the account is yours and coming to me. Sure, I'll unblock promptly. Apologies for the inconvenience. Durova^Charge! 19:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)