User talk:EEMIV: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:59, 24 August 2016

SEMI-RETIRED

I'll check Wikipedia several times daily but don't have the time to remain engaged in more than a handful of articles. If there's a particular area where I can be useful -- mediating or weighing in, that kind of thing -- drop a line on my talk page and I'll head over. I'll still have sporadic bouts of time to edit heavily, and most of those will be Star Wars-related.

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

If I left a message on your talk page, please respond there.
You may leave a new message here. Unless you request otherwise, I will respond on this page.

Important Notice: Your 2013 Arbitration Committee Election vote

Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis

Support request with team editing experiment project

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

Star Wars Barnstar

The Special Barnstar
For your tireless efforts on The Force (Star Wars) and numerous Star Wars-related articles, I award this Barnstar to you! — TAnthony^Talk 18:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TAnthony: -- thanks. My meatspace respite is concluded and I'm back to work, so the semi-retired banner all of a sudden is again more relevant. But I'll keep keeping an eye on things and contributing where I can. --EEMIV (talk) 19:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Where is the upload form? I will need to enter it there, but can't seem to exactly find the relevant space for it.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from this

May I request that you do not involve yourself in discussions that do not exactly concern you unless you have something to contribute to. It would be my equivalent to going over to users you've edit warred with previously and hoping to seek an alliance. As for the repeated "antagonistic" accusation, the user saw your previous message heading on my talk page before I removed it, and not out of sheer "coincidence" as you were hoping to make it out to appear.

I was willing to work with you, but the fact that you insist on bringing up old issues and hoping to gang-up on users who disagree with you, on matters and misunderstandings that you were not involved in to begin with is a borderline of WP:BATTLEGROUND and WP:HOUNDING. Please take care not to repeat it.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 21:30, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#rfc_A1D7316|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 51251 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
-== Refrain from this ==
+== Please refrain from this ==
 May I request that you do not involve yourself in discussions that do not exactly concern you unless you have something to contribute to. It would be my equivalent to going over to users you've edit warred with previously and hoping to seek an alliance. As for the repeated "antagonistic" accusation, the user saw your previous message heading on my talk page before I removed it, and not out of sheer "coincidence" as you were hoping to make it out to appear.