User talk:Edithgoche
Welcome!
Hello, Edithgoche, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Tipu Sultan did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. regentspark (comment) 20:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Tipu Sultan. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Note that another Wikipedia article is not a valid reliable source; see WP:WPNOTRS for further details. LiberatorG (talk) 06:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. regentspark (comment) 12:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)- FYI, please use the talk page of the article when you find yourself reverted often and/or seek WP:DR. --regentspark (comment) 12:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- Regarding your email to me. If you post an unblock request (see the guide to appealing blocks) here stating that you will not edit war again, I, or some other admin, will unblock you. Regarding why the "good" edits you made were not accepted, no one really has the time to check whether which edits were good or and which ones weren't. Since you were edit warring, the whole lot got reverted. I suggest that you post the unblock request and then reinstate the edits you think are good ones while also adding explanations on the talk page. On wikipedia, liberal use of article talk pages is usually a good idea. Best. --regentspark (comment) 14:36, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Unblock request
I understood why I have been blocked and I won't edit war again. Please unblock me.