User talk:Edward130603: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:23, 7 August 2009

		User:Thehelpfulone/Awards		Fun
Homepage	Talk	Awards	Random	Fun

This is Edward130603's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

From Thehelpfulone

Hi there!

Welcome to Wikipedia - I see that you made some edits on my userpage and I was wondering what's up?

Hope to hear from you soon!

The Helpful One 22:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Sorry, I was just messing around. I already undid the edits.

--Edward130603 (talk) 22:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User:Editorofthewiki/Sandbox has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. BoomerAB (talk) 21:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That page was a Sandbox page!--Edward130603 (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures

--Edward130603 (talk) 01:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Edward130603 (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! — Aitias // discussion 20:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLove

-TheZdrok (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Your rollback

Excuse me, why did you undo my edits? I saved all the facts and removed fan service and useless information about the characther and non wikiable content. Can you tell me a reason why? DragonZero (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relationships are nor wikiable for character articles. Abilities, that explains itself. The plot was shortened and compressed. DragonZero (talk) 01:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is that so? Sorry then...Just revert my edits back to the way they were. Next time, in your edit summary, say what you said above instead of just removing it. Thanks! --Edward130603 (talk) 01:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DragonZero (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Tamara Movie Page

Hey, no problem on the Tamara movie page, it doesn't look that much better since I didn't cut down the actual article but I think the forematting looks more wiki acceptable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.239.97.131 (talk) 00:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bubble tea!

-down load | sign! has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or drink this bubble tea on the giver's talk page with {{subst:slurp}}!

Centre/Center

Sorry but I changed it back to "centre" which it was initially and which is the original English spelling probably used in all countries except the U.S. (and maybe Canada I don't know). But if you insist to enforce the American spelling...well I changed it back to "center" and "neighbor" (instead of the correct "neighbour".

Thanks for letting me know. Next time, remember to add an edit summary to make sure others don't mistake it for vandalism. In addition, sign your comments :D--Edward130603 (talk) 12:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I just changed some more spelling into the american "catalysed" to "catalyzed" etc. Sorry I didn't read your comment before I submitted it so I didn't exactly "add an edit summary". I will do it next time! Thanks for the advice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSeyd (talk • contribs) 12:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblocked

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1360030 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Sandstein 21:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

My room mates must have gotten on my computer and created a account. Please lift this block. I did not create User:Amoebaprotist.--Edward130603 (talk) 19:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're lucky it's just an autoblock; see WP:GOTHACKED. Sandstein 21:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism

He'd signed up for it. ResMar 22:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry then!--Edward130603 (talk) 22:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment of Nocturnes Op. 37 (Chopin)

Hey, saw you rated Nocturnes Op. 37 (Chopin) as a start class. Any suggestions on how to improve it to a C-Class or a B-Class? I think the sources are quite sufficient and both quality of the prose and MOS compliance are fine. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR _{talk // contribs} 14:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NocturneNoir, you're right! I have changed it to C-class. See talk page for more info.--Edward130603 (talk) 15:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic processing of your editor review

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 21 April 2009 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. End of line. DustyBot (talk) 03:54, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to Members of Wikiproject Aquarium Fishes

Notice to Members of Wikiproject Aquarium Fishes If you have recieved this notice it is because you signed up for the WP:AQF mothly newsletter, and have made a contribution to wikipedia within the last month. Wikiproject Aquarium Fish has seen a decline in member involvement over the past several months. This project is neary dead. I am trying to revive this project. Anyone who is still interested in working on this project please reply back to Drew R. Smith (talk) 23:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)). If you know of any active members who have not contributed recently and might be interested in the project please forward this message to them. If no reply is given member will be removed from member list. Thank you. Drew R. Smith (talk) 23:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It does not need to be top priority. I was just trying to update the member list, it is overcrowded with ancient members who haven't posted in years.Drew R. Smith (talk) 23:07, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

choctawhatchee/choctawhatchie

Yep, I misspelled it. Sorry about that. It took me a while to figure that out. As far as I am concerned, the two pages need to be combined.

19:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)~ Qippyquote 4-29-09 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qippyquote (talk • contribs) 19:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Aquarium Fishes WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XI - May 2009

News

We have a (semi) working newsletter again!
Please welcome our new member: asbruckman (talk) April 2009 (UTC), and Mynameinc (talk) May 2009 (UTC)
Articles recently created: Arius berneyi, and Hippocampus kuda
Did you know... (Featured on the Main page):
- ...that the Violet goby, which looks like a tiny dragon, is actually almost blind and harmless? (May 3rd, 2009)
See or edit the current tasklist here

Discussions & Collaborations

Hippocampus kuda has been significanty expanded, however more input would be great.

Other

Activity in Wikiproject Aquarium fish has slowed to a crawl, it seems. We still have a few dedicated editors plus a few new faces (myself included). Any participation is appreciated, however we really can't tackle big projects with this level of activity. Give us a shout if you want to become active again!

Nocturnes Op. 37 (Chopin)

I have added some more specific feedback, as you requested, in Wikipedia:Requests for feedback#Nocturnes Op. 37 (Chopin). Chzz ► 03:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling ("analyses")

[1] FYI, "Analyses" is actually the plural of "analysis". It's a moot point, since at the moment there was only one link, but if there were links to more than one analysis, it should indeed be "analyses". Stevage 00:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I never knew that! Also, I think it would be better if the information in the external link is incorporated into the article. If I remember correctly, external links should be kept at a minimum in articles.--Edward130603 (talk) 01:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, it's better to incorporate some information, then cite it. But failing that (time being finite), imho it's much better to simply link to the external analysis. Stevage 01:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright--Edward130603 (talk) 01:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yowa

hey! i asked for help yo not some steeyoupeed generical idiot thin gimme real help yo! Shadow grin (talk) 15:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)shadow grin[reply]

Hold on, I'll come to your page. Please refrain from signing your name 3 times for one comment.--Edward130603 (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FLG archives

You'd be interested to read this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Academic_views_on_Falun_Gong&oldid=136958147

Archives from that article that we are proposing to be deleted. It's not actually badly written, but over the course of the last year, it was almost blanked entirely. You'd find it amusing. Colipon+(T) 04:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, the article was much better then, than it is now. The archive had much more information and I certainly would not have nominated it for deletion if that were the case. The archive only needed a bit of cleanup (cite errors...).--Edward130603 (talk) 11:34, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for fixing this: [2] --HappyInGeneral (talk) 06:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem!--Edward130603 (talk) 10:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement

Are you online for the next few hours? I want to bring this edit to Arbcom/enforcement. Would appreciate some help. Colipon+(Talk) 14:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm right here.--Edward130603 (talk) 14:58, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have time, could you please look up edits on the main Falun Gong article, its family of articles, and all talk pages (as well as all previous RfC's, Admin Noticeboards, Content/NPOV noticeboards etc.) for the numerous diffs of POV/disruptive editing by this user? These are very important. Colipon+(Talk) 15:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would be pretty hard. Olaf is tricky.--Edward130603 (talk) 15:08, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that it's hard and he is tricky, but that's precisely why I need help. I've began editing an arbitration enforcement request. I have already gathered a few diffs myself - they are not that hard to find. One way to do it is just do a search of all "Wikipedia talk" pages. Colipon+(Talk) 15:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All WP talk pages? I don't understand.--Edward130603 (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like Olaf hasn't done much until recently...--Edward130603 (talk) 15:20, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Most of the complaints in the past were filed against either asdfg or dilip rajeev. By "WP talk pages" I just meant go and search all the former complaints and see if you can get diffs there. I know PCPP had a few solid diffs but PCPP himself had also gotten in trouble with edit-warring. Colipon+(Talk) 15:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've archived the page here. Please edit it as you see fit. Colipon+(Talk) 15:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PCPP: Haven't asked him yet. He's quite "pro-CCP" though, it seems. He also hasn't been on since Aug 4. I want to get this out today. Colipon+(Talk) 16:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm relatively new to this FLG stuff...so I think you could probably get more from asking people such as Mrund, PerEdman, and Ohconfucius.--Edward130603 (talk) 16:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am quite glad Olaf reacted. Now it's visible so more editors can pitch in. Olaf's antics on the talk pages and articles is pretty obvious to anyone who just passes by and takes a 3-second look at the page. Anyway, do you have e-mail? Colipon+(Talk) 21:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:19, 7 August 2009 edit Edward130603 (talk \| contribs) Rollbackers 1,411 edits →‎Arbitration enforcement ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:23, 7 August 2009 edit undo Colipon (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 25,811 edits →‎Arbitration enforcement Next edit →
Line 218:		Line 218:

	:::I'm relatively new to this FLG stuff...so I think you could probably get more from asking people such as Mrund, PerEdman, and Ohconfucius.--'''[[User:Edward130603\|Edward130603]]''' ([[User talk:Edward130603\|talk]]) 16:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC)		:::I'm relatively new to this FLG stuff...so I think you could probably get more from asking people such as Mrund, PerEdman, and Ohconfucius.--'''[[User:Edward130603\|Edward130603]]''' ([[User talk:Edward130603\|talk]]) 16:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

			::::I am quite glad Olaf reacted. Now it's visible so more editors can pitch in. Olaf's antics on the talk pages and articles is pretty obvious to anyone who just passes by and takes a 3-second look at the page. Anyway, do you have e-mail? [[User:Colipon\|Colipon]]+<small>([[User talk:Colipon\|Talk]])</small> 21:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC)