User talk:Elinruby: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Del
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
→‎questions about NPP bot: (ec) About regex questions, and previous comments.
Line 12: Line 12:


::{{ping|Kudpung}} please do not post any further to my user page, as I find you insulting, and apparently it’s mutual. I will ask my questions elsewhere. [[User:Elinruby|Elinruby]] ([[User talk:Elinruby#top|talk]]) 19:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
::{{ping|Kudpung}} please do not post any further to my user page, as I find you insulting, and apparently it’s mutual. I will ask my questions elsewhere. [[User:Elinruby|Elinruby]] ([[User talk:Elinruby#top|talk]]) 19:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
::: {{ec}} <small>(ec note: The following comment was originally composed in response to [[Special:Diff/1122474882‎|this post]] at section {{slink||Jublains archeological site}}; adding it here instead)</small>
::: Without taking a position on the merits, it's unfair to make a comment like <s>that</s> <u>[[Special:Diff/1122474882‎|that]]</u> about [[User:Kudpung|another editor]], while simultaneously disinviting {{them|Kudpung}} from posting on your Talk page (next section) as it gives {{them|Kudpung}} no opportunity to defend {{themself|Kudpung}}. As this is your Talk page, I'm sure Kudpung would have the grace to give you the last word, even if {{they|Kudpung}} didn't agree with you (in fact, {{they have|Kudpung}} done so above, in {{their|Kudpung}} statement about disengaging, which imho you misread as a desire not to answer, but which I read as a desire not to fight with you). Imho, it's fine to ask someone not to post on your page, but in that case, decency and fairness requires you to no longer post potentially negative comments about them, which makes the post above a cheap shot. I hope that as long as Kudpung is disinvited from your page, you'll never mention {{their|Kudpung}} name again; that would be the decent thing. As far as regex questions, fire away! [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 20:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:21, 17 November 2022


    questions about NPP bot

    @MB: Quck question. Is there a specific dedicated piece of software that is used for NPP? It sounds like you watch the feed. What I am trying to establish right now is whether NPPers use an attended interface like Twinkle, or whether it's more akin to a spider doing batch processing, in which case the check I have proposed will not work. Thanks. Elinruby (talk) 14:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    NPPers watch the feed. Some reviewers look at the oldest unreviewed articles first, some look at newest, some start in the middle, some look as specific article types or subject area. Yes, there is a tool we use filter the feed and help with other reviewer actions. MB 14:47, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for that answer, and I apologize for the delay in answering you; I had a connectivity issue. I think it would be best if I took a look at the feed interface before asking further questions, and am putting that on my list of things to do. Elinruby (talk) 19:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It's at Special:NewPagesFeed and it's accompanied by a full set of excellent sophisticated tools that have been in use since 2012 and which I also helped to develop. You can see them here but you do not have the access right to use them. There are around 750 accredited New Page Reviewers, more if you count around 1,100 admins who automatically have access. None of them are expected to be polyglot. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kudpung: please do not post any further to my user page, as I find you insulting, and apparently it’s mutual. I will ask my questions elsewhere. Elinruby (talk) 19:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict) (ec note: The following comment was originally composed in response to this post at section § Jublains archeological site; adding it here instead)
    Without taking a position on the merits, it's unfair to make a comment like that that about another editor, while simultaneously disinviting him from posting on your Talk page (next section) as it gives him no opportunity to defend himself. As this is your Talk page, I'm sure Kudpung would have the grace to give you the last word, even if he didn't agree with you (in fact, he has done so above, in his statement about disengaging, which imho you misread as a desire not to answer, but which I read as a desire not to fight with you). Imho, it's fine to ask someone not to post on your page, but in that case, decency and fairness requires you to no longer post potentially negative comments about them, which makes the post above a cheap shot. I hope that as long as Kudpung is disinvited from your page, you'll never mention his name again; that would be the decent thing. As far as regex questions, fire away! Mathglot (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]