User talk:Fairness And Accuracy For All: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:52, 8 February 2007

They huffed, and puffed, . . .

Thank you for offering your opinion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GabrielF/ConspiracyNoticeboard (2nd mfd). Look forward to seeing you around in 2007 at Conspiracy Central! For a little fun, check out Brad Greux's video blog at The Most Brilliant and Flawlessly Executed Plan, Ever, Ever. Good cheer from The Mad Dog, Morton devonshire 20:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My response to Morty

File:Bushreadingthepetgoat.jpg

Ahoy there, unflagging Bush-junta supporter!

The spamalicious graphic notification you left on my (and 25+ other) talk page[s] was in violation of WP:SPAM, specifically "promotion of ...Web sites, fandoms, ideologies, or other memes." How would you like it if I left you a similar message promoting 911 Truth: Bush read about a pet goat while America burned? Wait... I just did! :-) Good cheer, returned - F.A.A.F.A. 23:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note to those who may have come here to provoke and/or bait me

I may consider any and all contentious posts from certain individuals an unwelcome attempt to harass and/or bait me. Any such comments may be removed at my discretion in accordance with WP. "Users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments (on their own talk page) at their discretion." -F.A.A.F.A. 06:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

	CABAL-FREE ZONE
	This user space is guaranteed to be 100% Cabal Free, and 'sanitized for your protection'. "Certified Grade A, 100% Cabal Free" - U.S. DIvision of Cabal Inspectors - D.H.S. Fairness And Accuracy For All 01:02, 31 December 2006 (UTC) Inspected by number 23[reply]

Barnstar Award

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your work in dealing with sockpuppet, specifically User:ClemsonTiger, I award you this barnstar as a measure of thanks. Chris 00:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You were a big help with the directory too. - Fairness And Accuracy For All 19:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lets try this again

This user page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump.

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/OpenNote is deprecated. Please see User:MediationBot/Opened message instead.

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Example. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you, [signature]

Please be civil

Your comments to Tbeatty are not appreciated. Since you are clearly mischaracterizing his edit summary, and he has asked you to quit readding the comment, would you please do so?

Thanks, —Doug Bell ^talk 07:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

for 24 hours for this [1] edit summary among other things. Comparisons with Stalin are pretty much 100% unhelpful. Guy (Help!) 07:49, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK - probably deserved it -- But having my comments deleted three times by Tbeatty was pretty damn annoying. - Fairness & Accuracy For All 07:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe next time don't readd them twice, then it will only be one third as annoying. —Doug Bell ^talk 07:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True dat! LOL! - Fairness & Accuracy For All

(joke) In the words of one nearly-famous Wikipedian....:"My entire purpose here is to ~~protect Wikipedia from being sued for libel~~ bring more humor to Wikipedia, and Wikipedia administrators understand that." Fairness & Accuracy For All

Well done for taking it in good part. Please do try WP:DR, it may help to resolve these disputes. Also perhaps read some of TBeatty's work on articles less politically charged, it may help you to respect him more as an editor. I have tried this several times with people I've been in dispute with. Guy (Help!) 11:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a friendly, easy-going guy in most cases - but its pretty frustrating dealing with editors who know WP well enough to argue entirely contradictory understandings and application of the same WP depending on if they're trying to include something, or exclude something. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! Fairness & Accuracy For All

Oh the irony! :o) Guy (Help!) 16:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note to Tbeatty

Note to Tbeatty : Sorry my tongue-in-cheek attempts at humor fell flat with you. Seriously though --your repeated actions of raising the spectre of Willy Horton when talking about the Peter Roskam article is an example something that political operatives advise against. (unless you are trying to bias others against Roskam, that is). You see -- these actions have planted the mental image of, and thoughts about a convicted rapist and murderer in the same 'mental frame' as Peter Roskam - in my mind -- and possibly the minds of others reading your comments -- probably not what you intended. Politics 101, Mr. Beatty. - Fairness & Accuracy For All 08:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving your talk page

Usually when someone archives their talk page, the removed edits are put in an archive. Otherwise, it would be more accurate to leave an edit summary that simply said "deleting". —Doug Bell ^talk 14:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps like me, you didn't know that a blocked editor can't even edit their own archive pages. I saved the edits in a text file for when my 24 hr is up. Apologies will be graciously accepted. - Fairness & Accuracy For All

Perhaps you should ave waited... Guy (Help!) 16:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did know that, which is why when the "Archiving" comment went by not once, but twice, in my watchlist I came and looked into it. Since I archive my talk page by including links into the page history instead of maintaining a separate archive, I figured that maybe you used the same approach.

Perhaps you should have reverted the changes back once you found you couldn't archive them.

And had I said something requiring an apology, I would offer one. I was merely commenting on your action, not assuming bad faith. It had occurred to me that you might be planning what you said, but the fact that you made two passes removing comments from this file did not quite fit with that scenario since it would be logical that you had tried to start or edit the archive file after cutting the first chunk of comments from the talk page and would have discovered your problem before cutting the second chunk out. —Doug Bell ^talk 19:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you didn't considered the scenario that after I discovered that I couldn't access my archive page, and created a text file, I went ahead and archived more comments to this text file because I didn't think it was any big deal, or that anyone would actually care, as I planned on adding to them to the actual archive page as soon as the 24hr is up. I admit that 'apologies' was a smart-ass remark. That's probably cause I'm a smart-ass. (with little respect for authority as well!) Sorry if it upset you. I consider this matter closed. I hope you do as well. Peace. - Fairness & Accuracy For All 21:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I considered your option, just considered it unlikely enough to make my comment. No worries, I'm much harder to upset than that...matter closed. —Doug Bell ^talk 21:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone please remove the threat

Would someone please remove the threat from my user page and maybe if so inclined run a checkuser on what IP or user posted it? Thanks - Fairness & Accuracy For All 02:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I alerted on it Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Death_threat_posted_to_user.27s_page. --BenBurch 03:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ben! I don't believe its a legit death threat or even a legit threat though, only some pathetic loser's attempt to harrass me. They say you're a 'nobody' on Wiki until you've been threatened. I guess I have arrvived. LOL ! I wish the troll would have used The Godfather allusion with the horsehead in the bed though! Much 'more better'! - Fairness & Accuracy For All 03:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I take all such threats seriously, and where the perps can be found out I always hand them over to the authorities. --BenBurch 04:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's probably good advice. I just read a disturbing account on a Wiki-critical site about one Wiki editor's inappropriate actions towards another editor - who was a 16 year old girl! There are some sicko-psychos out there in cyberland! - Fairness & Accuracy For All 05:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If that kind of crap continues to happen on your userpage, put in a request for semi-protection at WP:RFPP.--MONGO 06:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks MONGO - Fairness & Accuracy For All 07:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are Wikistalking me on the Talk:Peter Roskam page. Stop this course of conduct immediately. This is your final warning before I seek remedial action from an administrator. Dino 15:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:51, 8 February 2007 edit DeanHinnen (talk \| contribs) 2,143 edits →‎Would someone please remove the threat ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:52, 8 February 2007 edit undo DeanHinnen (talk \| contribs) 2,143 edits →‎Would someone please remove the threat Next edit →
Line 111:		Line 111:
	:Thanks MONGO - [[User:Fairness And Accuracy For All\|Fairness & Accuracy For All]] 07:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)		:Thanks MONGO - [[User:Fairness And Accuracy For All\|Fairness & Accuracy For All]] 07:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

	[[Image:Stop hand.svg\|left\|70px]] You are [[WP:STALK\|Wikistalking]] me on the [[Talk:Peter Roskam]] page. This is your final warning before I seek remedial action from an administrator. [[User:DeanHinnen\|Dino]] 15:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)		[[Image:Stop hand.svg\|left\|70px]] You are [[WP:STALK\|Wikistalking]] me on the [[Talk:Peter Roskam]] page. Stop this course of conduct immediately. This is your final warning before I seek remedial action from an administrator. [[User:DeanHinnen\|Dino]] 15:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)