User talk:Gwickwire: Difference between revisions
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs) →The Signpost: 04 February 2013: new section |
Ryan Vesey (talk | contribs) →WP:OWNTALK: new section |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0456 --> |
<!-- EdwardsBot 0456 --> |
||
== [[WP:OWNTALK]] == |
|||
Demiurge can be held responsible for whatever he does elsewhere, but you will be held responsible for any edit warring you do on his talk page. Per the link above, he can remove whatever he wishes from his talk page. [[User:Ryan Vesey|'''''Ryan''''']] [[User talk:Ryan Vesey|'''''Vesey''''']] 23:16, 7 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:16, 7 February 2013
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwickwire. |
|
Template:Archive box collapsable
The Signpost: 28 January 2013
- In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention
- Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics
- WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess
- Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests
- News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
- Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
- Arbitration report: Doncram continues
- Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of brightest stars
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of brightest stars. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
February 2013 Wikification Drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's February Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!
On Arydberg
He may have been topic banned before, but the topic ban in question was in fact imposed just last week. [1] - The Bushranger One ping only 19:28, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- His most recent discussion regarding the topic ban was just last week, but there's a long history as well. He's never followed a topic ban through, and has always been blocked for breaking it. As far as I can remember, the last block came with a message saying "you're indef topic banned, appeal after you're a good editor". Regardless, it's too soon for an appeal, and he's WP:NOTHERE for the encyclopedia, just for his POV. gwickwiretalkedits 19:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Caught in a landslide, no escape from reality... Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 04:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- I was actually trying to quote the kid who was loopy on his way home from the dentist in my edit summary. But that works too. Regardless, I asploded in reading it, so I don't know how I'm replying to you right now... gwickwiretalkedits 04:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
From th:arbcom
Thai Wikipedia mainly uses Buddhist Era (BE, พ.ศ.), which is more than Christian Era for 543 years just in number. So, 2555 BE is already the same year of 2012 AD. --Octra Bond (talk) 06:32, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
There isn't really a speedy that fits, so instead I have added it to the existing MfD. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 21:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
My user profile was deleted for copyright infiringement, but i won the company Gladiator Merchandise that I am talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sasam129 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter that you own the company if you violated copyright. I am not an administrator, so I cannot see the deleted text, nor is an administrator anywhere near likely to give it to you or me. So, assuming you copy-pasted the whole thing, that is a huge no-no. Unless you are willing to allow anyone, anywhere, to reuse the text for any reason with only so little as a link back to the original page, then you cannot use it on Wikipedia. If you can agree to this, see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for how to do that. Be warned that it'll still require massive cleanup to meet WP:N, WP:TONE and other policies. gwickwiretalkedits 18:14, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 February 2013
- Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles
- News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun
- Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes
- In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry
- Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Demiurge can be held responsible for whatever he does elsewhere, but you will be held responsible for any edit warring you do on his talk page. Per the link above, he can remove whatever he wishes from his talk page. Ryan Vesey 23:16, 7 February 2013 (UTC)