User talk:Harishsk2022: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Note: Reply
→‎April 2024: Block extended
Line 45: Line 45:
== April 2024 ==
== April 2024 ==
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;[[User:Nick Moyes|Nick Moyes]] ([[User talk:Nick Moyes|talk]]) 10:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock -->
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;[[User:Nick Moyes|Nick Moyes]] ([[User talk:Nick Moyes|talk]]) 10:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock -->

I have now increased your block to ''two'' weeks for completely ignoring the cause of your block. You were told clearly to cease being disruptive by demanding that a specific edit is made. I will remove access to edit your own talk page if you repeat that demand. You may only use your talk page to request an unblock, but that would only happen if you clearly indicate that you understand why you were blocked and that you will not repeat your disruptive actions by constantly demanding the same edit is made. Thank you. [[User:Nick Moyes|Nick Moyes]] ([[User talk:Nick Moyes|talk]]) 13:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:27, 14 April 2024

remove highlighted from devanga page

The caste claims to be descended from Devala, an ancient Hindu sage. They originated from Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, and during the reign of the Vijayanagara Empire they migrated to Tamil Nadu. They are of Shudra status in the Hindu caste system. However, they use the Devanga Purana, a text sacred to the Devangas, to claim Brahmin status, despite having a non-Brahmin profession. They replaced their native local gotras with Sanskritic gotras. https://www.academia.edu/34856230/Summary_of_Devanga_Purana Harishsk2022 (talk) 11:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Devanga Dharma

Draft:Devanga Dharma, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Devanga Dharma and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Devanga Dharma during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 00:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please allow to publish devanga dharma Harishsk2022 (talk) 05:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 09:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks jus remove that why because Wikipedia is very good platform should have correct information devanga are basically from Karnataka region we are leading as kingdoms as king long time ago but you are keeping shudra sentences not fair to Community will not tolerate this
Please you also ask them to remove that sentences
you told you will change if get sources
Hello
please find reliable source in the below link no where it is mentioned that we are shudra
see and change it
https://pure.northampton.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/55104710/Haridarshan_Pooja_2021_The_influence_of_the_childhood_experiences_of_women_in_Bangalore_India_upon_their_aspirations_for_their_children_socio-cultural_and_academic_perspectives_A_community_based_study.pdf
Harishsk2022 (talk) 09:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing will happen if you remove that sentence
Jus remove asap Harishsk2022 (talk) 10:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note

About your edits at Talk:Devanga and other noticeboards and talk pages (WP:ANI, WP:TEA etc.), please don't spam every page asking for your edit to be accepted - this will not make it get accepted faster (quite the opposite). You've already made 5 edit requests to Talk:Devanga alone. I don't understand if in the source no where it is mentioned that we are shudra that means it's false? I would advise you read WP:RS again and find a proper source. If you cannot, maybe just drop the metaphorical stick and focus on another part of the wiki.

On a side note, competence is required and I would advise you write in coherent English when communicating as some of your sentences seem to run on for a whole paragraph and don't make grammatical sense, hampering communication between you and other users. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 10:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.
I am telling you to remove that sentences
That's I think you are able to understand my English
Nothing will happen if you remove Harishsk2022 (talk) 10:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As you will see from the notice below, I have removed your ability to edit Wikipedia for one week.
Your repetitive demands, made in multiple places, and on multiple occasions to make an edit that you feel mustbe made is disruptive. That must stop, and you must learn from this short block. Any editor may, of course, make an edit request and be prepared to back up their request with evidence. However, you have been disruptive by repeating the same call, over and over again.
When your block expires in one week, you may return to editing, but you must not act in the troublesome way you have been doing. If the consensus is not to make a change, then that change will not happen - no matter how many times you ask it to be done. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 10:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello
please find reliable source in the below link no where it is mentioned that we are shudra
see and change it
https://pure.northampton.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/55104710/Haridarshan_Pooja_2021_The_influence_of_the_childhood_experiences_of_women_in_Bangalore_India_upon_their_aspirations_for_their_children_socio-cultural_and_academic_perspectives_A_community_based_study.pdf
Harishsk2022 (talk) 12:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are currently blocked because of your disruption. If you want to discuss your behaviour that led to the block, that topic is open for discussion at this time. However, as a normal rule, blocked editors should not be discussing content of articles—and you absolutely may not just keep bludgeoning other users with the same request for an edit via your talk page while you are blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 12:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nick Moyes (talk) 10:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have now increased your block to two weeks for completely ignoring the cause of your block. You were told clearly to cease being disruptive by demanding that a specific edit is made. I will remove access to edit your own talk page if you repeat that demand. You may only use your talk page to request an unblock, but that would only happen if you clearly indicate that you understand why you were blocked and that you will not repeat your disruptive actions by constantly demanding the same edit is made. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]