User talk:Hatchens

Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University

Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University Added source, please move to main page — Preceding unsigned comment added by TOKYO2021 (talk • contribs)

Participate in the discussion

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2021_Uttarakhand_flood#Page_name A discussion was already started before you created the similiar article. Please tell your opinion there. Regards

Draft:Vector Risk Management

Hi, you recently tagged my article for a speedy deletion, and I have understood why. I have changed the parts where you may think is disturbing, and I was hoping if you could check it out again. Thanks.

News1India Hindi News Channel

Hi,

I am trying to create a page for Draft:News1India, but it declined by you. This news channel in India. This is not any type of advrt. I am not understud that why this submission declined. I collect all information from Indian news channels. I am not connected to News1India. Can you help me to resolve all issus?

OFRA Cosmetics

Hi Hatchens! I saw your comment on my article denial, and I'm a little confused. I worked with a reviewer yesterday, and he helped me find super credible sources and said nothing about my tone. My goal here is to spread awareness about animal rights and cruelty-free beauty. I have another article draft I'm working on as well for an animal charity organization, Mardi Paws. Can you help me understand how I need to change my article and get it approved?

Draft:Rolf Engen

Good afternoon, Hatchens,

Thank you for taking a look at my Draft. I have made several changes over the last month or so in order to continue to formalize the tone and to make additional changes recommended by a previous reviewer (I have been working on this for a while now). I just made some additional changes as well just now. Are there any more areas that to your eye clearly need improvement? I'm having some trouble continuing to find ways to neutralize/flatten the tone (this is my first Wikipedia article, so please forgive my amateurism!). Thank you for your help - I'm looking forward to finishing this one up so I can start on my next one.

Good afternoon, Hatchens,

I went ahead and made numerous, additional changes to the draft. It is substantially more factually-driven and more neutral in tone now - thank you for your help.

Mohammed bin Rashid Centre for Leadership Development (MBRCLD)

Hi Hatchens,

I recently uploaded an article under for the Mohammaed Bin Rashid Centre for Leadership Development and I have noticed that it has gotten rejected within less than an hour. I have reviewed the article and I see nothing but facts in it, much like any other page about a learning centre or training institute. May I know why it was rejected and what I can do to improve it?

Draft: Arunabha Ghosh

Please let me know what needs to be changed. I have removed a lot of the language which sounded 'like an advertisement', but the submission was still rejected (for the third time). All of the statements made have citations and legitimate references. Not making any exaggerated claims or anything.

Draft:Manindra_Kumar_Roy

Hi Hatchens,

Thank you for taking time to look at my draft and leaving a comment on the page (Comment: VCs are generally considered notable. But, that doesn't mean puffery is allowed. Kindly redraft it, and submit it for a review.). According to the criteria for notable academics, I believe I article should qualify. I made a lot of edits and provided secondary sources that are independent of the subject in the article. It got declined few times and now I am not sure what is the reason. Are secondary sources in Bengali language are the issue or the writing style of the article? I would really appreciate any advise from you that would help. Thank you very much.--— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maximroy (talk • contribs) done by TTP1233 (talk · contribs).

Request on 13:27:13, 19 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Anderson1970

• Anderson1970 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Bengal Club (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, this is regarding the comments on my recent entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Bengal_Club As I am new to Wikipedia and the editor's comments appeared to be rather broad, I am writing to request specific guidance in what needs change in what section. I would appreciate any assistance. Thank you.

Introductory paragraph:

- Does the editor wish each and every description of the subject institution by the press to be removed, or only some? Alternatively, should the descriptions simply be summarised in two or three words and the relevant press articles be footnoted? In other words, is the problem one of verbosity or verisimilitude? - Does the editor wish the quote by the well-known columnist and the well-known novelist, describing their respective perceptions of the subject institution, to be removed?

History: - Does the editor wish the names and backgrounds of important historical figures who headed the subject institution to be deleted? - In the section on 21st century history, does the editor wish all references to essays by prominent scholars and writers, describing their respective perceptions of the subject, to be removed? Or, should the perceptions be summarised in two or three words and the essays footnoted? - Does the editor wish the details of historical discrimination in the subject institution, and statements by famous historical figures on the same, to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the details of the architectural history of the subject institution to be deleted? - Does the editor wish for any of the photos (which are stock images on Wikimedia) to be deleted?

Notable visitors: - Does the editor wish the name of any historical figure who visited the subject institution to be deleted? - Does the editor wish for any of the photos of the historical figures (which are stock images on Wikimedia) to be deleted?

Notable speakers: - Does the editor wish the name of any important speaker to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the photos of two well-known personalities speaking at the subject institution to be deleted?

Notable events: - Does the editor wish the mention of any event held at the subject institution to be deleted? - Does the editor wish for any of the photos to be deleted?

Facilities: - Does the editor wish the mention of any facility at the subject institution to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the quotes from the press to be deleted? Or, perhaps summarised and footnoted? - Does the editor wish for any of the photos to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the entire section to be deleted?

Cuisine: - Does the editor wish the entire section to be deleted, including the portions of potential historical significance? - Does the editor wish the favourable reviews by the press/scholars/experts to be deleted? Or, alternatively, summarised in a line or two and footnoted?

Art and artefacts: - Does the editor wish for any of the photos to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the entire section to be deleted?

Literary references: - Does the editor wish for any specific mention of a writer or book to be deleted? - Does the editor wish for any of the photos to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the entire section to be deleted?

Thank you.

Revisiting Dr. Vin Gupta contribution

Good evening,

I was hoping you'd revisit this AfC and consider approving it. This Doctor is one of the most prominent physician experts brought out on US national media regarding COVID-19 on a daily basis; he's NBC News' primary medical analyst. Viewers should know his background; other contributors to NBC have their own wikipedia page (Dr. Nahid Bhadelia as an example).

Thank you in advance for your reconsideration given the times,

Caroline

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Vin_Gupta

nano-x article

Hi - you rejected an article under consideration on a company (nano-x) as reading like an ad - I'm not sure how you reached that conclusion given the significant amount of material referenced claiming the company is a fraud, and the imho rather neutral, fact-based and meticulously referenced history of the company I have labored to include. A parallel article exists in the hebrew wikipedia and I believe since this is a nasdaq-listed company that people would be well-served to have a serious article on it in the english version of wikipedia. Perhaps you can point out specific elements in the article that disturbed you.

about article

I created a "DirectDL" named article. But I don't know why reviewers and you do not accept that. I use this service each day and See the website domain on google. It was created four months ago. I don't believe a website with 4-month age can have a lot of good references on the international web. But I see the "Bitport" page too. I believe "DirectDL" and "bitport" use the exact mechanism. But, it has some references more than DirectDL, and DirectDL has local (not international) references. I try to understand everyone who reads this post; sometimes, you have to see and pass. You can't find significant international sources for a 4-month torrent cloud torrent service. But about local sources, I can give some references in turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran and... I hope the dear reviewer has noticed it. 2A03:EF42:4005:8B58:1:2:A505:9FA6 (talk) 07:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

article link is https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:DirectDL E V I L044 (talk) 07:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

@E V I L044 thank you for reaching out. I understand your dissatisfaction. But Wikipedia works on the pre-defined principle of notability. Please see WP:WEBSITE and WP:FAILN, as we are talking about a portal. Kindly update the draft and resubmit for another review based on the readings. If you need further assistance, please visit WT:AFC. - Hatchens (talk) 08:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

i add new reference in article please check. many thanks for your work. E V I L044 (talk) 08:37, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Hatchens can you review article again? E V I L044 (talk) 04:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

@E V I L044 the draft is not ready for namespace. It will remain in a stage of denial till you update it as per the guidelines provided at WP:WEBSITE and WP:FAILN. You have the full rights to seek other reviewers help at WT:AFC. All the best! - Hatchens (talk) 04:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

I resubmit that but try to understand you; all of the edits happen because I add new references. For example, in the last edit, I asked a question from the reviewer: can I use local references? and he said: set local references on the article, not send them to me! I never send links to him, and I ask only questions. after that, I set some local country references but sadly, it did not accept. About the article, the function of the site is straightforward. It converts torrent (peer-to-peer) to direct link (DDL). You can get on the site and work with that. This is enormous proof that shows that the article's content is not inappropriate at all. But if the reviewer accepts, I can add new local country references (turkey- Saudi Arabia - Iran ) to the article. E V I L044 (talk) 08:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Improved my Article, help in reviewing.

Dear Hatchens, I have improved my article SSM College of Engineering and also added a WP:STUB tag at the end for its expansion by other users. Now that I have submitted the same for review, can you please help me in its review.

Thankyou in advance. Tm718 (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@Tm718 thank you for reaching out. I'll help you in updating the draft as per the Wikipedia guidelines. But, for the review and acceptance, let's wait for other reviewers to chip in. - Hatchens (talk) 03:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kate and Charles Noel Vance House has been accepted

Kate and Charles Noel Vance House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:37, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@Bkissin: Thanks for accepting it. - Hatchens (talk) 14:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emojiland has been accepted

Emojiland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 17:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

@CNMall41: Thanks for accepting it. - Hatchens (talk) 03:03, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Entering One_source template to new plant species articles

Hello Hatchens,

Thank you for reviewing some of the plant species pages that I created (Peperomia macrorhiza, Peperomia peruviana, Peperomia umbilicata). I noticed that you entered the One_source template there. While I understand how this is technically justified when the article is a stub with literally one footnote I was left wondering if it makes sense in such species articles. Here is why:

• The pages are actually not just based on one source because they are linked to Wikidata and through there to several botanical databases. If the One_source is supposed to tell the reader this information is somehow less valid because of lack of footnotes, then that just doesn't apply here.
• These connections are also given directly to the reader through the Taxonbar template. The links provided by the Taxonbar are direct links to credible sources. The reader can verify the article information with a single click.
• I haven't seen other reviewers place the template to new species pages.
• I haven't seen the One_source template placed on species articles created by bots. Even though some of them have been around a long time. See for example: Peperomia fagerlindii

This is not a complaint. I'm just wondering which practice makes most sense with such species articles. Any thoughts?

Cheers, Gemena (talk) 12:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

@Gemena thank you for reaching out. First of all, let me thank you for creating those scientific articles which are much needed for Wikipedia. And, also let me thank you for adding the second sources to all those pages and removing the "one source" tag. The problem lies with the interpretation of the guidelines; neither you're mistaken nor I'm wrong. If you need my support to find sources for your entity pages, just ping me. I'll be more than happy to make myself available to you. Just keep up the good work! - Hatchens (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

ANI thread moved to COIN

Hi. I moved the ANI thread you recently posted to WP:COIN. Please note that both ANI and COIN require you to place notices on the talk page of every editor you mentioned; you appear to have only done so for one editor. Please notify the other editors in your report. You can find notification instructions at the top of WP:COIN. Thanks, Levivich 16:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

@Levivich I'm doing it right away. -Hatchens (talk) 16:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. I saw also that I moved that thread about 45 seconds before you were about to do the same thing :-) Levivich 16:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

@Levivich I reverted my additon just after checking with yours. Lol. Thanks mate! I appreciate your help. - Hatchens (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

My GSD G4 was contested

Make what you will of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Henick (2nd nomination). Your opinion is welcome whether for or against 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

@Timtrent I'm soon joining you there. You know very well, I never go against your logic. - Hatchens (talk) 16:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Always check my logic. I am not infallible. The community has suggested and proved my logic to be incorrect before. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

@Timtrent: It's your logic only which guided me through Wikipedia from day 1. So, I trust you. Besides that, we both are here on Wikipedia with a conscience - good or bad? Depends on who is asking for it! - Hatchens (talk) 03:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

As long as you remember that I am fallible, that works for me 😊 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:16, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

– Joe (talk) 12:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

---

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

– Joe (talk) 12:53, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

---

@Joe Roe could you please point me to the pages which are identified as promotion and direct advertising? - Hatchens (talk) 13:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

You tell me. I have seen evidence that you have both accepted commissioned drafts at AfC and directly contributed promotional material to them. As the above template says, you must list each article you were paid to edit (including AfC reviews) as part of the disclosure required by our Terms of Use. – Joe (talk) 13:13, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

@Joe Roe as per the rules, I'm bound to explain you my edits and my AfC acceptances. All, I'm asking if you could assist me with the pages and explain me the evidences. Because, I'm not paid for any edit on Wikipedia, so it's too hard for me to explain you something which I have not done in the first place. Help me, so that... I can give my reasons for edits and acceptances. Whatever you decide afterwards, I'll stick to your decision. - Hatchens (talk) 13:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

I already decided to block you based on the evidence I've seen and I don't find your denial plausible. But, to be clear, you don't have to convince me of anything: if I'm wrong, you can appeal this block to another CheckUser or to the Arbitration Committee by following the instructions above. You're far more likely to get back to editing if you're honest with the community, though.

But as just one example, could you explain how you came across Draft:Nikhil Kamath and why you decided to accept it? – Joe (talk) 13:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

@Joe Roe thank you Joe for giving me this opportunity. I have known "Nikhil Kamath" as "an entity via" news and other findings. In fact, I was the one who created the wikidata of Nikhil Kamath on August 7, 2020. Here is the link - https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q98115159&offset=&limit=500&action=history. The draft of Nikhil Kamath was accepted by me once I saw it on AfC list on February 6, 2021. Proof - https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q98115159&offset=&limit=500&action=history. Now, just imagine...if I'm a paid editor; why should I wait for 6-7 months for an article to go-live? Secondly, If I'm an UPE for Nikhil Kamath, I wouldn't have participated in current ongoing AfD on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zerodha_(2nd_nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smallcase (2nd nomination) (which happens to be company backed by Nikhil Kamath's firm). I hope this convinces you to look at my edits on an impartial grounds. - Hatchens (talk) 14:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

@Joe Roe now let's find out who is the UPE on behalf of Nikhil Kamath;

You received a complain from an editor who accused me of doing doubtful/COI edits on Nikhil Kamath - [Link -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#The_unearthing_of_massive_UPE_operation], a comment added by an editor User:Nomadicghumakkad

This allegation was made after my deletion votes on Zerodha AfD and Smallcase AfD.

Now, just visit those AfDs again and see who is voted KEEP for Zerodha; its User:Nomadicghumakkad

This proves who is the UPE, and how I'm getting targeted for exposing a company called RankHawn. -Hatchens (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)