User talk:Ihardlythinkso

“ I was thinking yesterday, in all my life, I have never been so harassed, wantonly smeared, blatantly lied about or otherwise trashed as I've been on this website. Not even nearly. ” — Gwen Gale (talk) 00:58, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

“ The way to avoid 'incivility' is to avoid the triggers for it. ” —  Malleus Fatuorum 13:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

"Fellow workers of INTJs often feel as if the INTJ can see right through them, and often believe that the INTJ finds them wanting. This tendency of people to feel transparent in the presence of the INTJ often results in relationships which have psychological distance. Thus colleagues find the INTJ apparently unemotional and, at times, cold and dispassionate. Because of their tendency to drive others as hard as they do themselves, INTJs often seem demanding and difficult to satisfy. INTJs are high achievers in school and on the job. On the job, they take the goals of an institution seriously and continually strive to respond to these goals. They make dedicated, loyal employees whose loyalties are directed toward the system, rather than toward individuals within the system."
Keirsey, David; Bates, Marilyn (1984). Please Understand Me: Character & Temperament Types (Fifth ed.). Prometheus Nemesis Book Company. p. 182. ISBN 0-9606954-0-0.

Userboxes

vn-13This user talk page has been vandalized 13 times.

This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know.

This user does not understand mean people. Please be nice.

INTJThis user has an INTJ
Myers–Briggs Type Indicator

This user has nibbled
The Donut of DOOM

FREE PENYULAP

This user supports the presidency of Donald Trump.

Discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Ihardlythinkso

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Ihardlythinkso. - MrX 21:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48

I have moved your response to GoldenRing from the admin-only section. Please tweak as necessary. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are indefinitely topic-banned from post-1932 American Politics. You may request reconsideration at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard six months after the imposition of this sanction.

You have been sanctioned per this AE thread.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. ~~~~

Empathy

You demonstrated it. Thank you. This characteristic is incompatible with narcissism. MaxBrowne (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Yes, defending obvious trolls is quite empathetic. 207.38.154.23 (talk) 02:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)