User talk:Isotope23

Isotope23 is sort of here... and sort of not... so I may not respond all that quickly. Just remember though; BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!

If I've deleted an article you created and you are here to protest, please clearly state the name of the article in the header of your note on my talkpage so I can investigate.

Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17

Abusive language

Hi, Isotope23.
Here I report you the repeated actions of abusive language of user:Evlekis on Wikipedia. These can be found on his userpage.
See this:

• "cunt" - Pizda (in Slavic languages). Not used in polite language.
• "cock (penis)" - Kurac (in South Slavic languages, I think also in E Slavic languages). Not used in polite language.
• "fucking" - Ebanje (in most Slavic languages it's said "jebanje", but I think that in Macedonian and in Bulgarian they use hyperekavian form, "ebanje". Also, in other Slavic languages, "ebanje" reminds on "full word form", and mentioning that "shortened" form is the thing that's not used in polite language.
• "fart" - Paardenlul. Variation of prditi.
• "fucker" - Caralho. "karati" in Serbian = "fucking", so sounds like "f*ckalho".
• "vluggertje" - in Dutch "quickie".
• "knullar" - in Swedish "fucking".
• "gomno". - Sounds like "govno", in Slavic languages meaning = "shit".

Also, many curses used.

• "go to c*ck" - Idi U Kurac (in South Slavic languages). Heavy curse.
• "Suck c*ck" - Pushi Kurac. (in South Slavic languages). Reads as "puši kurac" in S Slavic languages, if you want to check the meaning.
• "vaffanculo" - in Italian. Not used in polite language.

Uploaded pictures with abusive language. Also, the picture this user, user:Evlekis, uploaded, contains text with abusive language.
[1].
Leccacazzi. "Cazzi" in Italian means "cocks, penises". Not used in polite language. Leccami la mia figa'. "Figa" in some Italian dialects means "cunt".
Contains text in Hungarian. Hungarian user might tell you the meaning.

• User Evlekis also uploaded this picture, containing text with words "cunt". [2].

Here're some changes, so you can see that he, user:Evlekis, uploaded that text on his userpage [[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], etc.. Mostly in the section A_Fictional_Story_unrelated_to_actual_events...well...a_few....
We don't have to tolerate such users.
Wikipedia has explicit policy of dealing with such persons and such behaviour. This was not just one incident, as you see this is a bunch of repeated actions/edits.
He should be banned from editing Wikipedia. Kubura 10:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

• You might want to bring this to ANI... I'm not nearly a good enough linguist that I feel comfortable blocking for this sort of thing.--Isotope23 ^talk 20:41, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dalmatia

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dalmatia. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dalmatia/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dalmatia/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 20:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Silent AfD

Of course not - unstrike away :) ELIMINATORJR 21:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

3RR violation user:DIREKTOR together user:Zenanarh

See [11] --Giovanni Giove 21:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for making you the "complaints department" again, but since he simply refuses to lay off I feel I must respond. The "reverts" this guy speaks of are ordinary edits. He persisted in adding info that was still dicussed between myself, Zenanarh and other Italian users to provoke someone into breaching the 3RR. He made seven reverts in one sitting earlier and it looks like he's gonna get away with it. Now he reports other people for making mere edits (and only four of those)... DIREKTOR 21:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

User:Hedgehog01

Hi there; if this guy is blocked why is he reverting my removals of abuse of other editors from his talk page, publishing my Wiki details on an external message board & accusing me of breaching 2RR (whatever that is!)? Your advice welcome before I pass this on elsewhere. --Rodhullandemu 22:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

You can still edit your own talkspace even when blocked unless the page is protected (as it is now). I didn't protect the page when I blocked the account.--Isotope23 ^talk 03:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Don Murphy

Hi Isotope - I'm not sure if we've crossed paths before (I think i've seen your name around) - but nice to meet you nonetheless...

I saw your note in the edit summary of your removal of Don Murphy's official site, and thought I'd come here.

My position is that if we are to have an article on somebody / something then to not link to their acknowledged 'official' site oversteps the mark of neutrality (ie. we're qualitatively analysing the link as unacceptable which fundamentally means taking a point of view) - it's also a bit embarrassing!

Anyhoo - I also wondered if you could point me in the direction of any centralised discussion (or i'm happy to discuss this here with you if you'd prefer) - I'd like to be able to restore the link.

thanks, Purples 07:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for commenting here. I don't believe there is a centralized discussion anywhere about this, but it probably would not be a bad idea to initiate a request for comment on this. There are a number of editors who have a very real and legitimate privacy concern with information posted at that site and I don't think linking it in the article serves Wikipedia's best interests or purposes. External links are a "nice to have", but I don't seen them as absolutely necessary unless they are being used to source the article. This isn't a "moral judgement" as Mangoe (talk · contribs) called it; it's simply weighing the benefits of having the link in versus the negatives. That said I would be totally comfortable with a RFC and following the consensus there... I just don't particularly want to see that link back in the article until the community at large is involved in considering this... it isn't really something that should be decided by one or two editors.--Isotope23 ^talk 13:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

totally agree that we're going to need a clear community decision at some point, and it's equally clear that your edits are thoughtful, and in good faith (thanks!) - you've probably seen the discussion under way here, I'll keep further replies on this to the talk page or that developing discussion, cheers, Purples 23:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

RFC on User:Italiavivi

I have requested community comment on Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Italiavivi. I know you have contacted Italiavivi previously in attempts to resolve his behavioral problem on the project. This is just a friendly notice. --Hu12 19:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

DHeyward Trolling and Wikistalking me

Hello, I first posted this to Thatcher131s page but he is busy. Dheyward is now not only Wikistalking me, but agitating about me on Mongos page. Could you please check this and ask him to stop?

User:DHeyward is following me around and (IMO) trying to provoke me. He showed up on an article I am active on for months Western_Hemisphere_Institute_for_Security_Cooperation that he had never edited, made a 'troll edit' and then erased my message to him advicing him not to troll the article. [12] The facts that he wont communicate about this issue which I posted to him in good faith and his troll edit to the article shows that he lacks good faith intentions on this article and to me (IMO). There are millions of articles on Wiki. Could you ask him to leave me alone and find another article? IMO his only object is to haunt me and get me to bite. I have now decided to avoid certain articles like Larry Craig so I wont be provoked. I am going to stay away from Crockspots favorite articles as much as I can. And I have since my block! And now I go to an article that I have been editing for months and Dheyward Wikistalks me there and haunts me. Please get him to stop and leave me be on that article. Thanks. •smedleyΔbutler• 12:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)