User talk:Jacurek: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 79.191.101.210 (talk) to last version by Timotheus Canens
FPAS "thank you" for baning me - JACUREK
Line 1: Line 1:
== June 2011 ==
#REDIRECT [[User:Jacurek]]
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] To enforce an [[WP:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 year'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 17:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=349940199#Motions_regarding_Trusilver_and_Arbitration_Enforcement March 2010 decision]</span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as [[WP:AN]] or [[WP:ANI]]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|proper page]]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->
{{tmbox
| style = background: #f8eaba;
| image = [[Image:Sock block.svg|75px]]
| text = <big>'''Blocked indefinitely&#32;for sock puppetry'''</big>
'''''You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppetry]] per evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jacurek]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], ''but'' using them for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]] reasons is '''not'''.
If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 17:27, 14 June 2011 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->
}}
:The first year of the block is made under the authority of [[WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary sanctions]] and subject to the normal protections accorded to AE blocks specified in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=349940199#Motions_regarding_Trusilver_and_Arbitration_Enforcement this motion] of the Arbitration Committee. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 17:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


<big>UGLY DOGS ARE BARKING</big>

(check ALL fucking IP's this is not me [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Miacek&diff=prev&oldid=436544076]
"The ugly dogs" did it all)


[[File:Sometimes i golf.jpg]]

::::<big>..AND JACUREK KEEPS PLAYING GOLF</big>[[File:Face-smile.svg]] LOL

This is how one dishonest administrator ({{admin|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}) and few nationalistic trolls can turn a good editor into a Wikipedia worst nightmare. GOOD LUCK--[[User:Jacurek|Jacurek]] ([[User talk:Jacurek#top|talk]]) 22:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:46, 28 June 2011

June 2011

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. T. Canens (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

The first year of the block is made under the authority of WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary sanctions and subject to the normal protections accorded to AE blocks specified in this motion of the Arbitration Committee. T. Canens (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


UGLY DOGS ARE BARKING

(check ALL fucking IP's this is not me [1] "The ugly dogs" did it all)


..AND JACUREK KEEPS PLAYING GOLF LOL

This is how one dishonest administrator (Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)) and few nationalistic trolls can turn a good editor into a Wikipedia worst nightmare. GOOD LUCK--Jacurek (talk) 22:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]