User talk:Kashmircloud

new section

first entryKashmircloud (talk) 23:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

(talk) , on 22:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC) made a false+ report..

explanation of my action

2008 kashmir unrest gives wp:undue importance to "kashmir protests" in the heading while ignoring the equally important JAMMU PROTESTS ..so to maintain NEUTRALITY, i had reverted the content to the previous heading since both kashmir and jammu are protesting due to "amarnath land transfer imbroglio"..hence the move to shift back content to original article name..Kashmircloud (talk) 23:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

besides i had retained the kashmir relevant content in the "2008 kashmir unrest" as a template for a seperate article on kashmiri seperatist protests (not limited to the land controversy--evolving scenario into seperatist movement)..Kashmircloud (talk) 23:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Amarnath controversy page

In future can you use the discussion facility before making such large scale changed to the page like you did in separating 2 pages that were eventually merged. Furthermore, instead of going through multiple edits you are encouraged to use the WP:Sandbox. Right now the page is a complete mess and needs a revamp through multi-edit wars (I'm not blaming you for it, there were many of us in there). Im trying to get the page back to some level of where it stood before we moved this far. Lihaas (talk) 13:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

biased editor

this guy is troll who edits with a propaganda based mentality hes a indian with a deep rooted hatred for anything pakistani such as the free land of azad kashmir i urge neutral editors to end his destruction spree on pakistani articles and producing rubbish —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.154.87 (talk) 14:02, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

im waiting for your response you only seem to be exclusively editing pakistani articles and adding propagandist indian material such as the term conjured by the indians "POK" i wil not allow this bye now.

Northern Areas

can you explain your logic for renaming besides being a indian propagandist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.132.156 (talk) 14:53, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: protection

Hello - thanks for the message. I have a statement about protection on my user page, but since you didn't or wouldn't read it I'll sum it up: I don't care which version was protected. I care that the edit war and the move war have stopped. Work out the differences on the talk page and come to some sort of consensus. KrakatoaKatie 02:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC)