User talk:Kkrystian

archive 1

Invitation

Would you be interested in joining a team effort to bring the Tantra article to featured article status.

If so, please see Talk:Tantra#Team Tantra

TheRingess (talk) 18:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Complaint about you

I notice that you have a pattern of removing additions that go against your Personal opinion Please do not remove my addition to the page discussing the idea of Maitreya as Antichrist. This is a well accepted theory amongst many people and should be considered as part of a complete picture of Benjamin Creme and his Maitreya proposition.

If you continue to remove it I will make a formal complaint to Wiki about your conduct.

If you feel the section should be modified, I am happy to discuss with you ways which you might find it more objective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthant (talk • contribs) 03:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Complaint about you

I complained about you at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#User:Kkrystian regarding adding unsourced positive information about Sathya Sai Baba. Feel free to defend yourself there.

"One of his devotees - Sharada Devi - says that before his death he told her secretly that in eight years he would reincarnate in Andhra Pradesh, under the name of Sathya (what means 'truth'), what is in accordance with the birth of Sathya Sai Baba in 1926, in Puttaparthi, Andhra Pradesh who claims to be the next reincarnation of Shirdi Sai Baba."

Andries 20:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

The same material is disputed on Sai Baba of Shirdi, I have cited other reasons too and also another editor has supported the removal.--Redtigerxyz 12:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Please go through the discussion at the talk page of Sai Baba of Shirdi. The claim of Sharada devi can be a part of Sathya Sai Baba (if referenced), not Sai Baba of Shirdi under mainly WP:UNDUE. Please discuss on article talk page and form WP:CON and then add the material again.--Redtigerxyz 13:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for joining "Team Tantra". Maybe we can have cool mugs and tshirts made. If you know of anyone who might want to join please extend an invitation to them to do so.

Our first milestone is to bring the article to "B" status (for a good description of what this means, please see the Hinduism Project's quality page, a link is provided on the project's template).

If you have any thoughts on what the article needs for B status, please add them on the talk page, or create an action item in the to do list.

Thanks again.

TheRingess (talk) 17:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Swami Yogananda Giri

The article notes that the man is Italian, and founder of the major Hindu organization in Italy.Bakaman 01:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Removing well sourced statements that you do not like

You seem to be specialized in removing statements that are well-sourced that you do not like. removing statement sourced to Bowen that Shirdi sai was eccentric and violent removing statement that Sathya Sai Baba claimed to be omniscient, omnipotent etc. sourced to Hummel and Blitz media interview

Your edits are part of a enduring pattern. I had repeatedly warned you not to do so. I will support a user RFC against you because I think that your edits are generally incompetent. I have lost patience with you. Andries 16:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

How is this a violation of Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Sathya_Sai_Baba?

[1] I think that you made a mistake here. Andries 20:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Sai Baba

Hi, thanks for your note. I think that the Sai Baba article could definitely be a good article with some improvements to the writing style. I may not have a lot of time to work on it, but I will try to improve it in whatever way that I can. — goethean ॐ 14:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

I'll take a look! — goethean ॐ 17:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you had done a lot of work addressing some of the issues I raised at the FAC. Please note, though, that the nominator isn't supposed to strike someone else's comments. The person that made the comments is the one who is expected to decide whether or not the issue is fixed, because sometimes there can be misunderstandings as to what the reviewer meant. Some reviewers tend to get pretty upset about it, which can prejudice them against the article, so be careful! Karanacs 19:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm taking at look at your changes right now. Karanacs 19:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Hinduism and other religions

Many Religons are related to Hinduism, depending where you are from. The Teachings of Hinduism is strictly taught to people who are related to Hinduism.

However, Hinduism has no text of any other religon in their books.

The following are some religons that are known to have relations with Hinduism from India

• Christianity
• Islam
• Sikhism
• Buddhism
• Jainism —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.253.131 (talk) 23:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Prema Sai Baba. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Dhartung | Talk 22:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Invalid links on Sathya Sai Baba

It would be better for both of us if you could read WP:EL and find out why those links are inadmissible on the article. Personal sites are not allowed, blog sites are not allowed, picture sites have no use for the article, and saisathyasai.com is a critical website that is forbidden by the second ArbCom resolution on the article. Continuing to re-add these links puts you in danger of vioolating the ArbCom resolution and you may find yourself being blocked, or even banned. That too, without the issue of edit-warring.

I do not want to have to repeat this to you all the time as I had expected you to improve as an editor after all these months. - Ekantik ^talk 20:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Sai Baba of Shirdi

Please refrain from reversing other editor's edits without first discussing them on the talk-page of the article. Such behaviour may be taken as edit-warring and hostile as well as unproductive. - Ekantik ^talk 20:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC) You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Ekantik ^talk 20:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of twenty-four hours for violating the three-revert rule at Sai Baba of Shirdi. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 23:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kkrystian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The text I removed didn't fit in the article. It was a personal opinion of an author (violating NPOV) camouflaged as a fact placed in the biography section. It means it did not fit there for several reasons

Decline reason:

Clear WP:3RR violation. Many of the links you were reintroducing were violations of WP:EL and/or WP:SPAM as well. — Yamla (talk) 16:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kkrystian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I disagree! I was not adding any forbidden links in that edit! What does it matter that I violated WP:3RR if my edits were correct! Come to think of it, the Ekantik probably also violated it

Decline reason:

Doesn't matter if your edits were correct; 3RR is to prevent edit warring -- in the absence of vandalism (and this does not include content disputes), 3RR must be respected. — jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 16:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No personal attacks

With regard to your comments on Talk:Sathya Sai Baba: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ekantik ^talk 05:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I personally do not appreciate your posting of links that have no purpose except to intentionally defame other editors. Please strictly refrain from doing this. Ekantik ^talk 05:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)