User talk:Lonediva

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.192.84.101 (talk) at 03:08, 20 March 2014 (→‎Autobiography is a bad idea: some advice on how to work on your recent changes.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Lonediva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dismas|(talk) 19:18, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Lonediva. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added Dismas. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Autobiography is a bad idea

Information icon Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Robin Clark. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:27, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since we all have a conflict of interest about ourselves, your best approach to making changes to the article is to post your proposed changes on the article's talk page, rather than editing the article directly. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Robin, thanks for helping improve wikipedia. Does the advice above make sense? For instance, when you were changing the page the other day, you converted the store from the Bronx to Manhattan. Also, you added a mention of 20 Years To Stardom as an event in 2013. Instead of putting those changes directly into the article yourself, the preferred approach is to make the suggestions at Talk:Robin Clark. For best results, you need to have some sources (newspapers/magazines/teevee/radio/government/academia) that prove that the additions are WP:NOTEWORTHY. Is there any press coverage of the 20 Years To Stardom stuff, where your name is explicitly mentioned? Put that URL on the talkpage, and somebody will check it out, and whip up a neutral summary. Does this make sense? You can leave me a note on my user-talkpage if you get stuck, or need help figuring something out: click 'talk' by my name, click 'new section' at the top, leave me your message, and click 'save'. Another good place to get fast answers to quick questions is at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Hope this helps; see also my longer advice at User_talk:sarahehill, if you wish.
  p.s. Apparently, the idea that the store was in the Bronx was sourced to the Washington Post... see WP:TRUTH, wikipedia has to print what the sources say... even when they are wrong! We try to avoid that whenever possible... in the worst case, we can say "in NYC" rather than specify the borough. However, maybe the 1986 article doesn't actually say the Bronx? Here is another URL, which allows a 7-day-free trial, if you want to check it out for yourself. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-3779757.html This is from the Chicago Sun-Times, as opposed to the Washington Post, but the author and the first sentence are identical. Also, of course, if the story was incorrect, and the papers never issued a correction, you could contact them *now* to ask for a correction of the record. Once they published such a thing, wikipedia could then be corrected. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 03:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]