User talk:MikeWazowski: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 2 edits by Djathinkimacowboy (talk): Removed unwelcome comments. (TW)
Line 70: Line 70:
Thank you,
Thank you,
Lenny Jason (I am the son of Jay Jason). <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jaytribute516|Jaytribute516]] ([[User talk:Jaytribute516|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jaytribute516|contribs]]) 14:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Lenny Jason (I am the son of Jay Jason). <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jaytribute516|Jaytribute516]] ([[User talk:Jaytribute516|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jaytribute516|contribs]]) 14:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== New sec. ==
Piss off Mike. I've had it with you. ''Yet again...''--[[User:Djathinkimacowboy|<font style="color:#DC143C">Djathinkimacowboy</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Djathinkimacowboy|<font style="color:#00013">''what now?!''</font></sup>]] 23:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:40, 12 January 2012

Help`

On the wikipedia sister site Wikiquote I was working on an article when I was autoblocked. They said that I had been sockpuppeting. I admit that I did in the past but I was innocent this time how can I tell them this if I am blocked from editing? TheyCallMeFirstKlass 16:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deezy.D. (talkcontribs)

So it sounds like your original account was blocked over there? If that's true, then any editing you do over there is probably a violation of a block or ban. I'm guessing that Wikiquote's blocks are at least roughly similar to Wikipedia's blocks. Go look at your original account on Wikiquote, the account that got blocked first. Look at your talk page and find the spot where your block was posted. The block itself should have instructions on how to request an unblock. I don't know your history, so I don't know if they will unblock. I do know that it's best if your request to be unblocked admits exactly what you did wrong. Cloveapple (talk) 21:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!! TheyCallMeFirstKlass 16:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Signs?

Why Did you delete the Darksigns page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by George.Trimm (talkcontribs) 18:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I never did - but if it was anything like the current version, which only consists of the words "Dark Signs is a best discribed as a" and nothing else, then it deserved to be deleted. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was working on editing it as it was deleted. But thanks for explaining. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by George.Trimm (talkcontribs) 16:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still working on the page don't delete it anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by George.Trimm (talkcontribs) 17:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how much clearer I can be - I'm not deleting anything. I'm simply tagging the article as a candidate for deletion, since at the time I tagged it, it was nothing more than an infobox, with no claims or signs of notability, and no references. If anything, this should be a watning flag to you to either accept that the subject doesn't pass muster to have an article and you need to stop recreating it, or that you need to wait until you have the references necessary before recreating. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Still multiple issues?

Hi Mike,

Does my page still have multiple issues? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roschier_Attorneys_Ltd.

If not, I was told the message must be removed manually.

--ChristineShaw (talk) 10:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see why you are asking here since it was MikeWazowski who twice tagged the article as having issues. I think you'll have better luck getting a response from him if we fix the weird technical glitch that got into your link. The article is at: Roschier_Attorneys_Ltd.. Mike, could you please check the article to see if you still think it is ad-like and promotional, and has sourcing issues? Cloveapple (talk) 19:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


OK, thanks Cloveapple! Not sure what happened to my signature, I have used the button in the template... But let's see what Mike says about the article. --ChristineShaw (talk) 09:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mike

You have deleted part of my life — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.103.59.238 (talk) 18:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you're referring to. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:50, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Block

Hello agian mike, User:Ks0stm (talk) block my IP adress in september of this year. I'm 14 so as you know I'm in school, does User:Ks0stm (talk)have to remove my block or can just any administrator? Deezy.D. (talk) 18:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speed deletion request removal

Hi. I just thought I'd let you know out of courtesy that I removed your speedy deletion request from the article DirectFix. I don't think it is unambiguous advertising. The article has 4 independent references. I think the article fails WP:NOTE, but as the author points out in the talk there are similar article on Wikipedia about iFixit and iResQ. If these are acceptable then I don't think it would be consistent to nominate DirectFix for speedy deletion. This is just my opinion; please feel free to request speedy deletion again if you wish. NereusAJ (T | C) 00:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that the user who created the article is named DirectFix, it seems unambiguously promotional to me. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:18, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, it is incriminating. It is definitely WP:COI. But still, this article is very similar to iFixit and iResQ. NereusAJ (T | C) 00:21, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Comedy horror, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Ghost Breaker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Schroers

Mike,

I saw that I received a speedy deletion for Jan Schroers page. The content on the page was pulled from him website-- which I authored. How can I prevent his site from being deleted?

Miriam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miriamschroers (talkcontribs) 17:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Li Shengshun

why do you keep adding a redaction to the Li Shengshun article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kusaga (talkcontribs) 19:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because the article is completely unreferenced, and you have shown no significance or notability outside the series. I've reverted to the redirect again, but if you try to restore it, I will nominate it for deletion. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Mike: Do you think I could talk with you directly? Would be happy to call you at your convenience. Thank you, Lenny Jason (I am the son of Jay Jason). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaytribute516 (talkcontribs) 14:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]