User talk:NoMonaLisa

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, NoMonaLisa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Carl.bunderson (talk) 07:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

older entry

~~Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you.~~ Carl.bunderson (talk) 08:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea!! I'm SOO glad that you are taking on the Sex Worker articles and category in WikiPedia! Thank you thank you! 75.203.113.51 (talk) 05:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC) (tara <AT> swopusa.org)[reply]

Proposed Project

John and I have both left a couple more comments for you at WP:COUNCIL/P#Sex worker issues, in case you weren't watching.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 01:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that there is probably sufficient interest to start the group as a task force of the Sexology and Sexuality WikiProject, if you want to start it. I could probably even adjust their banner after getting that project's consent on the talk page to include separate assessments for the new group. Let me know how you want to proceed with this. Thanks. John Carter (talk) 17:56, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I recalled it, we were going to shape this project as a subproject of Sexuality and present it a la the Hinduism/ Hinduism Mythology banner? Do we have too few people to do that rather than being a task force or is this mainly a semantics thing? I definitely would like to get on with getting consent from Sexuality Wikiproject in either case, John are you volunteering to do that?NoMonaLisa (talk) 07:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on the project's talk page, with no response yet. Personally, I think one week would be more than enough time for them to make any negative responses. There have been several cases I know of where such proposals are made, and people just don't respond if they don't have any objections. So, come the 15th, if I don't hear anything there, I figure to go ahead and change the banner. John Carter (talk) 13:24, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the thing that says "Oppose" in bold letters at the bottom of our proposal section in the WikiProjects page actually from the project?--NoMonaLisa (talk) 05:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it's someone saying he or she doesn't think we should have an independent project but that it should be a task force, evidently needs to read the discussion since that seems to be where things are headed at present. Apparently went through and commented similarly on every or nearly every proposal listed.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 05:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you link me up to where you put in your request? I was just looking and didn't find it.--NoMonaLisa (talk) 06:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also support this WikiProject (or Task Force) and have left comments over at WP:COUNCIL/P#Sex workers. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 03:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - John set this up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality/Sex workers work group.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 21:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful! So happy to see it finally together! Thanks for all your help Doug and John! I noticed that in the section that says, "Members should also feel free to add Template:User Sex workers work group to their userpages to identify themselves as members of this group,"that the link to the userbox is not created yet. I don't know how to go about doing this. Can we make that happen sometime soon? Thanks again.--NoMonaLisa (talk) 21:48, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthrosexual

Since you are part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, i would appreciate it if you could voice your opinion on the article Anthrosexual, which is currently up for deletion.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 06:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Work Task Force is Up and Running

Hi, I'm reluctantly on board CyntWorkStuff (talk) 03:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of sex work types

I have nominated List of sex work types, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sex work types. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Equazcion •✗/C • 18:07, 30 Apr 2008 (UTC) 18:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While this is a valid idea, it does not belong in article space. With your permission I will move it to your user page, which is where it should have been all along. --John (talk) 19:50, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoopsie for committing a Wikifauxpas! So, where is the list now?--NoMonaLisa (talk) 05:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Change name from "Sex work work group" to "Sex work task force"?

Polling all members of the group to see if they are OK with changing the name of the group. Poll is here. – Iamcuriousblue (talk) 13:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Play party (BDSM) (2nd nomination)

Since you are part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, i would appreciate it if you could voice your opinion on the article Play party (BDSM), which is currently up for deletion. --Simon Speed (talk) 22:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]