User talk:NovaSkola

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shakhriyar Mamedyarov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIDE Grand Prix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, NovaSkola. You have new messages at Acroterion's talk page.
Message added 02:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Acroterion (talk) 02:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Ibad

I posted a sourced statement which proves what you said is false and you reject it (i post an interview with an Azerbaijani general who fought in the war and you post from a propaganda movie), i leave your statement and add mine and you still delete mine, i post pictures from an Azerbaijani source and you claim its not proof. Stop with your vandalism, just because you want to believe he killed Monte doesnt make it true. Ninetoyadome (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninetoyadome (talk • contribs) 01:18, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Good article reassessment.

Hi there. I noticed that you recently nominated Azerbaijan Premier League and Neftchi Baku PFC for Good article reassessment. As this is something that it used for current good articles, and neither of those are listed as GA's at the moment, I believe that you wanted to nominate it for Good article nomination? If that is correct, you should remove the GAR-template at the talkpages and follow WP:GAN/I for instructions on how to nominate these articles for GAN. Cheers, Mentoz86 (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

I have warned you on my talk page

Just to let you know. Proudbolsahye (talk) 18:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement discretionary sanction: Armenia-Azerbaijan topic ban

The following sanction now applies to you (in accordance with the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions):

You are topic-banned (WP:TBAN) from everything related to Armenia or Azerbaijan for six months.

You have been sanctioned for the reason(s) set down in this Arbitration Enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision. This sanction has been recorded on the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a topic ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeal. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal. If you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.  Sandstein  06:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating your Armenia / Azerbaijan topic ban with your edits of 2 June 2013 about Azerbaijani football,

you have been blocked from editing for 48 hours. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there.  Sandstein  06:07, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.