User talk:Philip Cross: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:04, 27 April 2019

Template:Usertalkpage (rounded)

Archives

1: 10/05
2: 10/06
3: 10/07
4: 12/08
5: 05/09
6: 12/09
7: 11/10
8: 06/11
9: 03/12
10: 09/12

11: 11/12
12: 08/13
13: 12/13
14: 03/14
15: 08/14
16: 02/15
17: 07/15
18: 04/16
19: 07/16

20: 12/16
21: 05/17
22: 09/17
23: 02/18
24: 05/18
25: 07/18
26: 02/19

Wild Women of Piano

Hi, Philip. I've heard you like jazz. Last night I read a blogpost from a savvy WP-critic about some interesting BLP-less people (Tammy Hall, Ellen Seeling, ...). Given your experience in the area, I thought you might find this blog-post nourishing, provocative, and possibly funny.^[1] Is there a jazz portal where this message would be welcome? Also, thanks again for fixing one of my mistakes (an author's name) a while back. :) SashiRolls ^{t · c} 12:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ genderdesk (27 February 2019). "Wild Women of Piano". Genderdesk. that ought to keep the Wikipediocrazies busy for the rest of the black history month, if they bother with such things other than to mansplain to other people what they ought to be doing about it.

Wikileaks & Julian Assange

An editor has raised concerns that your recent edits related to wikileaks and Julian Assange are violations of your topic ban (see WT:AE). While I'm not convinced it's a blatant violation, it could be considered somewhat close to the edges of your ban. Please do go carefully and make sure you aren't seen to be violating it. GoldenRing (talk) 12:28, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed the Indictment page was safe for me to edit as the issues are (or perhaps were then) judicial and around law enforcement, with the deterioration of relations between Assange, an Australian national, and Ecuador and the unsealed US indictment being the main elements with no explicit reference to domestic (UK) politics. The comment from a very senior British politician (I have assumed including her name might be inadvisable) was only reactive and in passing, and thus, I thought, outside the topic ban. As the AE request is the only contribution to Wikipedia by User:Guantolaka, it is possibly a banned user with a sock-puppet account. Please advise further if necessary. Philip Cross (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My thinking is similar, but as you've continued the edits after my message above I've posted the request for arbitration on the user's behalf. See there for details (well, some details) of the user making the request - their edit history had not gone un-noticed. GoldenRing (talk) 17:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking clarification Guantolaka (talk) 09:04, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

United Constitutional Patriots

You appear to be exhibiting ownership of this article. Please stop.Terrorist96 (talk) 16:53, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[WWofpiano-1] rdesk (27 February 2019). "Wild Women of Piano". Genderdesk. that ought to keep the Wikipediocrazies busy for the rest of the black history month, if they bother with such things other than to mansplain to other people what they ought to be doing about it.

[1]

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 ::My thinking is similar, but as you've continued the edits after my message above I've posted the request for arbitration on the user's behalf.  See there for details (well, some details) of the user making the request - their edit history had not gone un-noticed.  [[User:GoldenRing|GoldenRing]] ([[User talk:GoldenRing|talk]]) 17:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
+:::[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Clarification_request:_BLP_issues_on_British_politics_articles Seeking clarification] [[User:Guantolaka|Guantolaka]] ([[User talk:Guantolaka|talk]]) 09:04, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 == United Constitutional Patriots ==