User talk:RudiLefkowitz: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 21: Line 21:


{{stop}} Please stop your [[WP:TE|tendentious editing]]. Multiple editors have appealed to you to [[WP:STICK|drop the stick]] but you seem deaf to both consensus and the appeals of your fellow editors to stop wasting everybody's time. I don't know what else to do, so I'm putting you on notice that if you continue on this path you are courting a [[WP:TBAN|topic ban]]. You should treat this as a final warning. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 18:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
{{stop}} Please stop your [[WP:TE|tendentious editing]]. Multiple editors have appealed to you to [[WP:STICK|drop the stick]] but you seem deaf to both consensus and the appeals of your fellow editors to stop wasting everybody's time. I don't know what else to do, so I'm putting you on notice that if you continue on this path you are courting a [[WP:TBAN|topic ban]]. You should treat this as a final warning. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 18:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

== Edit warring at [[Milo Yiannopoulos]] ==

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=]]To enforce an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] (specifically [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|this section]]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the &#91;&#91;WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard&#93;&#93; or &#91;&#91;WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard&#93;&#93;. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me ([[Special:EmailUser/EdJohnston|by email]]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.&nbsp; <div class="sysop-show"><hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Standard provision: appeals and modifications|procedure instructing administrators]] regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> The full report is at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=762672995 the edit warring noticeboard]. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 03:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:10, 30 January 2017

Hello!

A friendly word of caution

Tread carefully on Milo Yiannopoulos. Your editing history is suggestive of someone with an agenda bordering on obsession. And remember that 1RR is in effect. I've already reminded Bradv. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that the category you are trying to insert identifies Milo as being of Jewish descent vice Jewish. That said my reading of the recent talk page discussion suggests a very strong consensus against introducing something which looks like a backdoor attempt to claiming he's a Jew. If you want to pursue this (which I advise against) you need to do it on the talk page. I suppose you could post an RfC, though I doubt it will go in your favor. In the meantime I must insist you stop trying to insert references to his being Jewish or of Jewish ancestry without consensus from the talk page. Please remember that this article is subject to discretionary sanctions. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

Mz7 (talk) 01:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Milo Yiannopoulos (again)

stop Please stop your tendentious editing. Multiple editors have appealed to you to drop the stick but you seem deaf to both consensus and the appeals of your fellow editors to stop wasting everybody's time. I don't know what else to do, so I'm putting you on notice that if you continue on this path you are courting a topic ban. You should treat this as a final warning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Milo Yiannopoulos

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 


Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]