User talk:Sadko: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 75: Line 75:


Something tells me the IPs that have suddenly appeared at [[Smiljan]] are connected to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikola22]]. [[User:Amanuensis Balkanicus|Amanuensis Balkanicus]] ([[User talk:Amanuensis Balkanicus|talk]]) 23:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Something tells me the IPs that have suddenly appeared at [[Smiljan]] are connected to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikola22]]. [[User:Amanuensis Balkanicus|Amanuensis Balkanicus]] ([[User talk:Amanuensis Balkanicus|talk]]) 23:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
:Good point, I agree. VPN is being (ab)used in this case. '''[[User:Sadko|<span style="color:#EE8833;">Sadkσ</span>]]''' [[User talk:Sadko|<span style="color: #000000;">(talk is cheap)</span>]] 23:48, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:48, 24 January 2020


The Drama Llama is Watching You
The owner of this page reserves the right to delete trolling and drama at their discretion.



Autopatrolled granted

Hi Sadko, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 01:29, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information

Hi, Sadko. After reading one of your posts at the Admin's incident board I wanted to give you some info that might help you in the future. You stated " it is just that admins are sometimes rather busy and have too much on their plate and so they just count reverts (going by the book) and do not have the time to look at the content and the nature of reverts more deeply". In most instances it's not the job of administrators to judge who is right in an edit war. Of course, all editors engaged in edit warring believe they are doing the right thing. Editorial differences are to be discussed on the article's talk page and the article content is to be determined by consensus. Full stop. Any other course of action is edit warring. You must keep in mind that one can edit war without violating the three revert rule. There are exceptions detailed at WP:Edit warring but they are very few and extremely specific. I'm not commenting on the current discussion at AN/I or any of your past editing. I'm just attempting to make sure you don't run into future problems due to what might be a misunderstanding. Thanks for your time Tiderolls 15:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Laza Kostić


Đura Jakšić

Thank you for your hard work. I really appreciate it. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 22:26, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No problem; I hope I didn't misinterpret anything in either of these articles. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 23:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have a lot of work these days but I shall read the article several times a bit later. At first glance, everything seems to be in great order. Thank you kindly, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 23:59, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Koča Popović, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Order of the Republic and Order of Freedom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry and vandalism

Something tells me the IPs that have suddenly appeared at Smiljan are connected to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikola22. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 23:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I agree. VPN is being (ab)used in this case. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 23:48, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]