User talk:Salvio giuliano: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Salvio giuliano/Archive 95. (BOT)
Line 35: Line 35:


I see that you are busy at the moment, but when you find the time I need a clarification. Alexikoua is saying that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=1111306530 you closed that report with a warning to both him and me]. Did you warn me about edit warring? The only editor found there to be edit warring was Alexikoua, not me. [[User:Ktrimi991|Ktrimi991]] ([[User talk:Ktrimi991|talk]]) 08:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
I see that you are busy at the moment, but when you find the time I need a clarification. Alexikoua is saying that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=1111306530 you closed that report with a warning to both him and me]. Did you warn me about edit warring? The only editor found there to be edit warring was Alexikoua, not me. [[User:Ktrimi991|Ktrimi991]] ([[User talk:Ktrimi991|talk]]) 08:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

:Yes, I only warned him, but the template automatically closes the report as "warned user(s)". As I said during the discussion, Alex was edit warring and Alex was warned. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> '''[[User talk:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> 20:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:00, 25 September 2022


blocking

It's interesting that you have blocked me from editing Gun law in North Macedonia instead of blocking the user Kluche who reverted a stable version more than 3 times. Carpaniola (talk) 20:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because he stopped reverting, that's all. Should he start again, he'd find himself blocked just as much as you. As I said on ANI, you can be edit warring even if you are right. Salvio 20:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Let me add, I even gave you the chance of avoiding a block. You should have just said that you would stop reverting until a clear consensus was reached on the talk page... Salvio 20:16, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
you misunderstood my sentence (perhaps my fault) " The page is currently in its stable version, and in this should remain until the dispute is resolved." anyway the point is not there, the reason I reported the suspicious edits of the two accounts was to stop the edit war. I am fine with blocking for 48 hours, but I wanted to let you know that there was no intention from my side to continue the edit war, anyway sorry for the inconvenience Carpaniola (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LJstats/Prim96 (22 September 2022)

Hi Salvio. No sooner was the range block lifted than he has returned. See here, and here, His limited number of topics are the big giveaway here. I only revert per BMB. But it seems that regards Average human height by country, he's on a one-man mission and simply isn't going to drop the stick. Whether page protection of range block, the day he gets free access restored, the crusade will resume. As you're in the loop, I'll report straight to you where I feel things need attention here. Thanks. --Coldtrack (talk) 16:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification needed about a 3RR report closure

I see that you are busy at the moment, but when you find the time I need a clarification. Alexikoua is saying that you closed that report with a warning to both him and me. Did you warn me about edit warring? The only editor found there to be edit warring was Alexikoua, not me. Ktrimi991 (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I only warned him, but the template automatically closes the report as "warned user(s)". As I said during the discussion, Alex was edit warring and Alex was warned. Salvio 20:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]