User talk:Samofi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Samofi (talk | contribs)
Line 41: Line 41:
*[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|unsourced]] or [[Wikipedia:No original research|original content]]{{#if:Tivadar Kosztka Csontváry|, as you did to [[:Tivadar Kosztka Csontváry]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability policy]]. If you continue to do so, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 -->
*[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|unsourced]] or [[Wikipedia:No original research|original content]]{{#if:Tivadar Kosztka Csontváry|, as you did to [[:Tivadar Kosztka Csontváry]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability policy]]. If you continue to do so, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 -->
*[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add or change content without citing [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|''reliable'' sources]]{{#if:Tivadar Kosztka Csontváry|, as you did to [[:Tivadar Kosztka Csontváry]]}}. Before making any potentially controversial [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|edits]], it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 -->
*[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add or change content without citing [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|''reliable'' sources]]{{#if:Tivadar Kosztka Csontváry|, as you did to [[:Tivadar Kosztka Csontváry]]}}. Before making any potentially controversial [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|edits]], it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 -->

Fuck of u mutherfufker! Do you think Stefanik was fashist? Fuck your muther you shithole.

Revision as of 13:00, 11 April 2010

Please don't change articles to insert your own pro-Slovak/anti-Hungarian point of view. Thankyou, HawkerTyphoon 10:57, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Kikimora

Hello. Thank you for your recent edit to Kikimora. Your edit included one or more links to the page Slovak, which is a disambiguation page. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can help Wikipedia by revising the links you added to Kikimora to refer directly to the most relevant topic. (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and report the error to help us improve this feature.) --Russ (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Samofi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 


(Nobody bothered to put the welcome template on the new guy's page...how rude). :) On behalf of the Hungarian Wikipedians, I extend my friendly welcome to a new Slovakian colleague! I hope that we can work together productively and graciously. (as for your edits to Franz Liszt though--please, he wasn't Slovak. He was a Hungarian of German ancestry. I'm not saying that for any stupid nationalistic reason, I'm saying it because it was Liszt himself who always proudly declared himself to be a Hungarian.) But anyway, welcome again. :) K. Lásztocska 20:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He started speak hungarian in 18 years. He was session man of slavic meetings. If someone say few words in hungarian is it means that he is hungarian? Durring hard magyarization he used his contacts with Pius IX to make live of slovaks better. You can not say about nationality of die person who lived in national mixed area and his descent was mixed with 3 nations. Problem of hungarians is they live from history and hungarians change history as they wish... It is sad.

Please do not vandalize this page. You are welcome to make useful contributions to this article. Kassinachi (talk) 22:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Matthias Bel. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.--B@xter9 10:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--B@xter9 11:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV pushing, adding non reliable sources including a fascist site

Fuck of u mutherfufker! Do you think Stefanik was fashist? Fuck your muther you shithole.