User talk:Sandstein: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 7 thread(s) (older than 2d) to User talk:Sandstein/Archives/2011/April.
Line 52: Line 52:


:Sorry, the Wikipedia community has decided that the article does not meet our [[WP:N|inclusion requirements]]. Your request does not address these requirements and therefore does not convince me to undo my closure of the deletion discussion. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 20:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
:Sorry, the Wikipedia community has decided that the article does not meet our [[WP:N|inclusion requirements]]. Your request does not address these requirements and therefore does not convince me to undo my closure of the deletion discussion. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 20:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

== Request original entry for 'ch interpreter' ==

Can you please send the original contents that regarded the ch interpreter to my own user:garykline page? I need to compare the original with things I have found elsewhere.

thanks much.

gary kline
[[User:Garykline|Garykline]] ([[User talk:Garykline|talk]]) 22:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:27, 9 April 2011

Welcome to my talk page!

Please place new messages at the bottom of this page, or click here to start a new discussion, which will automatically be at the bottom. I will respond to comments here, unless you request otherwise. Please read the following helpful hints, as well as our talk page guidelines before posting:

  • Please add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. This will create an identifying signature and timestamp.
  • If you're here to inform me of a mistake I made while on administrative duty, please indicate which article is concerned by enclosing the title of the article in two sets of square brackets: [[example article]].
  • If you are looking for my talk page's previous contents, they are in the archives.


Start a new talk topic


Archieved thread

My talk page is not a forum for dispute resolution.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

"PANONIAN, you are posting messages to a thread at WP:AE that is already archived. Nobody is reading these messages, so I suggest you stop posting them. If you think that there is a dispute to resolve, please use the appropriate forum per WP:DR. Sandstein"

Oops, sorry. I did not know that thread is archived. I suppose that then I should open new thread about user Nmate. I mean, I do not know why this user is attacking me now because I did not had any recent disputes with him, but I certainly like to spend my free time in more creative way instead to defend myself from his accusations. I think that I own him this favor and that I should open new thread about him with evidences about his personal and ethnic insults addressed to other users. PANONIAN 06:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have no "personal" problem with PANONIAN, and neither is there any proof of ethnic insults that could be possible to bring up against me, because if there had had only one ethnic insult coming from me towards others, that would have brought up by those that the "ethnic insults " were adressed to. Or if so, they may not be happend within the confines of a reasonable time to be possible to bring up against me. In other hand, the reason why "I am attacking PANONIAN" is that that the parlance in which he spoke about Hungarians was not acceptable to me. But because the user has received an official ArbCom warning, I am being indemnified by that one ,and the case is therefore closed on my part.--Nmate (talk) 14:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just for the record: 1. I never said anything against ethnic Hungarians anywhere. It is clear that my posts are referring only to Hungarian nationalism and I have right to my political opinion about that political ideology. I never insulted anybody based on his ethnic, racial or religious affiliation, 2. I did not received any "official ArbCom warning". User:HJ Mitchell clearly said that I received notification and not a warning (it was just a notification "that I might be under sanctions if I do not behave in accordance with rules", but there was no conclusion that I did not behave in accordance with such rules in the past). So, Nmate, if you continue to lie about this notification I will ask that administrators officially forbid you to use word "warning" in relation to this. This is your second lie about me (the first was that I said something insulting against Hungarians). The only reason why I did not opened new thread about you is because I got bored with whole thing, but I can for sure open new thread for Wiki stalking and personal harassment that you conducting against me. Obviously, you trying to undermine my reputation in Wikipedia and it is evident that you stalking me and that you use same talk pages as I do. And here everybody can see history of your similar behavior in relation with other users: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PANONIAN/Evidences PANONIAN 16:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking 3RR

Please look at the recent reverts of Verman1 on these articles: Kosalar, Lachin, Daşkəsən, Tsitsernavank Monastery, and Gandzasar Monastery. He has also chosen not to discuss his changes in the talk page prior to or after making radical changes and has removed cited passages only to add in his own version. The quality of the articles can be improved, but erasing what one does not agree with is not the way to go about them, I hope he will understand this.--Moosh88 (talk) 04:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please use WP:AN3 for 3RR reports, and supply the diffs of the reverts as required by the instructions there. They will be processed more rapidly there. I do not currently have time to take a look at the situation, sorry.  Sandstein  05:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you have missed my notes in the Request for comment section, please have a look there. Thanks. -- Ashot  (talk) 06:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Submitting new BIO

HI Sandstein...I have been in touch with you in the past about issues and errors on my page (essentially due to not being aware of how WIKI works, what is appropriate, inappropriate, etc.) I have created a new BIO for my WIKI page, and would like to submit it to you for review. Please let me know the correct procedure. I also need to learn how to post photos. Thank you for your help, much appreciated. Constance DembyConstancemary (talk) 17:15, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

This aparently concerns Constance Demby. Ms. Demby, I would like to ask you to read our page Wikipedia:Autobiography. It explains why editing, let alone writing, your own Wikipedia biography is not a good idea. I therefore recommend that you follow the guidance on that page. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions. For how to post photos, please see Help:Files. Sandstein 06:34, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Sandstein... Clarifying the following statement that you commented on: “I have created a new BIO for my WIKI page” --- The current new version was actually written by author K. Safir. I supplied her with factual information, album info, dates, etc. Since there have been issues in the past, we both want to make sure that it's OK before it’s made public the site; we would like to know where to post it so that it can be edited and checked in case we need to change anything. thanks Constancemary (talk) 06:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Constance Demby[reply]

Hi. K. Safir should register a user account and post their proposed draft at User:Username/Constance Demby, where "Username" is the username chosen by K. Safir. They should then ask for comment by other editors at Talk:Constance Demby. If there is consensus among editors that the draft article is an improvement, it may be copied over the previous content.  Sandstein  18:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Case at AE might be ready to close

At WP:AE#Anonimu, you are the only admin still thinking that a block is the best course. I would be willing to close as no action, but would like to know if you have more to say. I did find fault with the submitter's reasoning, but confess that my study of Anonimu's edits in the last 12 months has been limited. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't object to the warning you propose.  Sandstein  18:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Striking that after reconsideration, will comment in the thread.  Sandstein  19:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request reinstatement of entry for "ch_interpreter"... .

Hello,

I would like to have the Wiki entry for ch put back into the encyclopedia. The interpreter has been useful in the development of my several dozen C prototypes (small C source code of 75 to 400 lines) that can easily be used by anyone to create larger programs. The ch article gives the reader the necessary depth necessary [or certainly helpful] to use the interpreter to maximum benefit.

thanks,

gary kline

Re:: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ch_interpreter

kline@thought.org Garykline (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the Wikipedia community has decided that the article does not meet our inclusion requirements. Your request does not address these requirements and therefore does not convince me to undo my closure of the deletion discussion.  Sandstein  20:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request original entry for 'ch interpreter'

Can you please send the original contents that regarded the ch interpreter to my own user:garykline page? I need to compare the original with things I have found elsewhere.

thanks much.

gary kline Garykline (talk) 22:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]