User talk:Soetermans

Warning

Please stop mass reverting edits of new users, especially when their edits are correct and the categories they add apply. Consistently Heinous (talk) 19:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

You've been asked before to stop unnecessarily adding WikiProject tags to talk pages. You've been issued a final warning already. Do you think this is the right way to go? soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

THANK YOU FOR SAYING THIS! He just did this to me about The Simpsons. He obviously thinks that because im newer to Wikipedia that i am wrong. I do know what im doing when it comes to stuff like this. Please just stop. ßåtrøşë (talk) 08:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Hey Batrose, maybe double check before you start chiming in: the user Consistently Heinous made several inappropriate edits and were temporarily blocked for it. I issued you a final warning. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 12:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

ok sorry ßåtrøşë (talk) 05:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

It seems to be a common trend look at the sources before playing games Inteqaam (talk) 18:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

• sigh* you're also unnecessarily chiming in. After Consistently Heinous was blocked for 72 hours, Batrose is blocked indefinitely from editing the article on The Simpsons. Double-check, would you? You've been here less than a month. I don't play games. I will revert any unnecessary edit. End of story. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 18:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

  I chimed in because I noticed a trend as you reverted three edits which were done to counter vandalism and I am not aware of the other users and what they did. Inteqaam (talk) 19:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User_talk:Atmospherpolyphonic

Mentioned you here, so just flagging as a courtesy. Of course the issue is not remotely with your conduct. Have a great evening. Star Mississippi 01:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. El C closed the discussion already, which I found too hastily, since Atmospherpolyphonic's latest comments. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK}`

That thoroughly unraveled after I logged off for the evening. Thank you @Black Kite and Isabelle Belato: for handling and sorry you had to be subject to their escalation Soetermans. Star Mississippi 14:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Same here. Apologies I wasn't around to chime in for round two, I had fallen asleep by that point. Sergecross73 msg me 14:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Star Mississippi and Sergecross73:, thank you both for your messages. No apologies needed, you were both very supportive of me and very patient with Atmospherpolyphonic. Too bad it ended this way. Another question though, should I take action (or preemptive action) for their threats on scholarly research with me as a subject? soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 18:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

I personally wouldn't worry about it. We don't even really know that he's a college student at all, all we know is that he claims to be. He certainly didn't act like he was was some sort of scholarly writer or college student. It might have just been a "flex" he was using to make it sound like he knew what he was talking about. And even if he was, there's still the possibility that he loses interest or fails to get it published. He certainly wasn't one for details or providing evidence. You could always remove your full name from your user page for a while if you're concerned. Sergecross73 msg me 19:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right. Thanks for the reassurance. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Missed these. Seconding @Sergecross73 here. While I don't think there was anything at all wrong to your actions -- even if there was, a college student's thesis isn't going to get articles written about systemic biases in Wikipedia that haven't been covered before in instances where it was an issue. That said, I've been harassed here before and I understand your concern. Blank your name if you're feeling worried, but I otherwise wouldn't stress it. Star Mississippi 15:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

"SQ/200" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect SQ/200 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 18 § SQ/200 until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 09:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

GTA San Andreas

Regarding your note on revision history, I am not adding anything new I added back what was removed without consensus, it is the one who removed the info without consensus that should ask for consensus, I merely added back info that was there even few days ago and had stayed for a long time, things about vehicles and all, but yeah selectively choose me to seek consensus, when I reverted it to OG state not added new info, as per rules the one who had removed long time established info should go consensus, anyway good day. Dilbaggg (talk) 03:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Eroges

Hello You blocked my last edit on this page, but just above my addition is this link https://www.eurogamer.net/the-bluffers-guide-to-hentai-games-article. That page has content that looks like a text from a spin rewriter. My addition is more meaningful and useful for a reader. Was that link inserted by paying to a moderator? Regards SomeWeb (talk) 11:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)