User talk:Soibangla: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 858045086 by Slatersteven (talk)
→‎Alert: new section
Tag: contentious topics alert
Line 34: Line 34:


([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

== Alert ==

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[WP:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect: any administrator may impose [[WP:AC/DS#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or any [[WP:AC/DS#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the [[WP:AC/DS#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Galobtter|Galobtter]] ([[User talk:Galobtter|pingó mió]]) 18:36, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:36, 4 September 2018

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
To thank you for all the article improvement you do filling in bare references - like here. Way too often, little improvements to the encyclopedia like that don't get noticed or properly appreciated. MelanieN (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trump Tower preparation meeting, IOW clear conspiracy

Good sources here that help to answer some questions: Why did they lie about this meeting so much? Why did Trump personally override the attempts by Trump Jr. and Kushner to be relatively honest about revealing this meeting. He literally trumped their attempt and issued a completely false press release. How could so many very key American and Russian people suddenly and by chance just happen to appear at a meeting in Trump Tower to discuss lifting sanctions without Trump knowing? Why has this meeting been considered the clearest evidence of collusion/conspiracy? This planning meeting makes it clear that none of this was by chance or happened without Trump's very close and personal involvement. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 09:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, the Committee to Investigate Russia is an excellent, non-partisan, fact-based source which cites many RS we can use. IMO, it should be considered a RS in itself as its Advisory Board is a group of very high profile and notable experts who are, in and of themselves, considered RS. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 09:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trump vs. the rest of the world about Russian interference

Hours after White House warns of new election meddling, Trump again points to 'Russian hoax'

  • "The two events created a split-screen effect: America's intelligence experts warning voters that Russia is trying to undermine democracy while Trump tells them it's all political chicanery."
  • "Several of Trump’s top lieutenants...described the threat in the White House briefing room....But Trump, whose operation is under federal investigation for possible collusion with Russia and obstruction of justice, swiftly contradicted his advisers’ conclusion in the midst of thousands of boisterous supporters here.

    "In Helsinki, I had a great meeting with Putin,"... Now we're being hindered by the Russian hoax. It's a hoax, OK? I'll tell you what, Russia's very unhappy that Trump won, that I can tell you."

    "In Helsinki, Putin said that he had hoped Trump would win the 2016 presidential election."

BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 07:40, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fox News (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to FOIA
Judicial Watch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to FOIA
The Gateway Pundit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to FOIA

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:36, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]