User talk:Spongefrog: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Spongefrog (talk | contribs)
Line 63: Line 63:
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 19:01, 28 September 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef -->
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 19:01, 28 September 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef -->
:As promised. A frivolous unblock request will result in talk page lockout too. --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 19:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
:As promised. A frivolous unblock request will result in talk page lockout too. --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 19:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
:Well then. It's finally come to this. Before I face the eternal abyss of wiki-death, may I be permitted to share a few words of wisdom?

There was such a time in which entire consciousness would have been disgusted by such a chain of events as have been witnessed today but now, as I stare into my wiki-shallow grave, hastily wiki-dug by those considered more wiki-capable than others, I feel nothing. Because really, who cares? Not me. After much self-analysis, thought, and with the perspective bestowed upon one by years of isolation from "Wiki-Pedia", I have come to the conclusion that this place is designed to encourage natural selection, the failure and death of weaker members if the human species. The hundreds of unhappy hours spent making futile edits, which, at the time, are made to seem glorious and virtuous. The much-denied hieriarchy. The suppressed hatred shown to newer users, ignorant of the multitude of "policies". The whole system rewards those with little-to-no stake in the affairs of real life (often shortened to the "IRL", only spoken of in whispers). Those with insecurities, perhaps concerning the size of their genitalia, are given a new outlook on life; they have the chance to wield considerable power over fledgling users, given that they are willing to dedicate ridiculous amounts of time to a machine which they have no reason to care about, besides the propaganda spouted by so many. The only solution that comes to mind is to jump ship and join citizendium. At least it's less vandalised. Not a bad idea now that I think of it.

This is why I came here to drive the final nail into my wiki-coffin (forgive the cliché). I welcome a block. But if any of you have any decency, let my final edit remain as warning to others. I dare you. [[User:Spongefrog|<font color="#004225" face="High Tower Text">'''Spongefrog''',</font>]] [[User talk:Spongefrog#top|<font color="blue" face="High Tower Text">(I am Czar of all Russias!)</font>]] 19:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:40, 28 September 2011

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Goodbye

Goodbye old friend. We had a good year and I'll be waiting for you to return :) All the best,--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 15:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adopt-a-user reminder

Hello, I have completed a general cleanup of the adopter information page for the adopt-a-user project, located here. During my cleanup, I have removed several inactive and retired users. In order to provide interested adoptees with an easy location to find adopters, it is essential that the page be up-to-date with the latest information possible. Thus:

  • If you are no longer interested in being an adopter, please remove yourself from the list.
  • If you are still interested, please check the list to see if any information needs to be updated or added - especially your availability. Thank you.
  • You are receiving this message because you are listed as an adopter here.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Netalarm (talk) at 03:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Happy Holidays - hope to see you back someday

          Happy Holidays!
Dear Spongefrog,
Best wishes to you and your family this holiday season, whether you are celebrating Christmas or a different holiday. It's a special time of the year for almost everyone, and there's always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! ;)
Love,
--Meaghan [talk] 14:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Happy belated New Years SF!--White Shadows We live in a beautiful world 11:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC) Spongefrog is here for Wikipedia 10th birthday. Hello White shadows and meaghan. Happy birthday, happy new year, happy christmas and hannukah, kwanzaa whatever else I've missed, you are all absolutely amazingly amazing well done, Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 21:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support WikiProject New Mexico

It was recently suggested that WikiProject New Mexico, to which you are a member, may be inactive or semi-active and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. After reviewing the project it appears that there haven't been much active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. I have begun a discussion on the projects talk page to see how the members of the project feel about this suggestion. Another user has added the project to the WPUS template and I added it to the list of supported projects in the WPUS main project page but before I take any further action I wanted to contact each of the active members for their input. --Kumioko (talk) 14:51, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 01:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When did I join that? Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 18:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

Spongefrog, I'm afraid your RfA has a very low chance of succeeding. Not only did you vote for yourself (which, for the record, is a big "no no" when it comes to RfA), you have been inactive for several months and haven't demonstrated why you need the tools. I may be wrong, but it seems like you think of adminship as a trophy rather than as an extra set of tools. I suggest you withdraw your self-nomination, edit actively for a year or more, and see if anybody on this page is willing to nominate you. Kindest regards, The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 18:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to come back, then be productive. If all you want to do is troll, then go away. Anything like that again, and I will block you for being too immature to participate. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have closed your RfA per WP:NOTNOW, as it didn't look like it was going to pass. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 18:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Whoah guys, I think you *may* have the wrong guy here!! :P I understand if it was a simple mistake however. Love and kisses, Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 18:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:01, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As promised. A frivolous unblock request will result in talk page lockout too. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well then. It's finally come to this. Before I face the eternal abyss of wiki-death, may I be permitted to share a few words of wisdom?

There was such a time in which entire consciousness would have been disgusted by such a chain of events as have been witnessed today but now, as I stare into my wiki-shallow grave, hastily wiki-dug by those considered more wiki-capable than others, I feel nothing. Because really, who cares? Not me. After much self-analysis, thought, and with the perspective bestowed upon one by years of isolation from "Wiki-Pedia", I have come to the conclusion that this place is designed to encourage natural selection, the failure and death of weaker members if the human species. The hundreds of unhappy hours spent making futile edits, which, at the time, are made to seem glorious and virtuous. The much-denied hieriarchy. The suppressed hatred shown to newer users, ignorant of the multitude of "policies". The whole system rewards those with little-to-no stake in the affairs of real life (often shortened to the "IRL", only spoken of in whispers). Those with insecurities, perhaps concerning the size of their genitalia, are given a new outlook on life; they have the chance to wield considerable power over fledgling users, given that they are willing to dedicate ridiculous amounts of time to a machine which they have no reason to care about, besides the propaganda spouted by so many. The only solution that comes to mind is to jump ship and join citizendium. At least it's less vandalised. Not a bad idea now that I think of it.

This is why I came here to drive the final nail into my wiki-coffin (forgive the cliché). I welcome a block. But if any of you have any decency, let my final edit remain as warning to others. I dare you. Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 19:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]