User talk:Static Hash

October 2020

Hello CGOV. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Amanat Ali, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:CGOV. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=CGOV|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Ravensfire (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Ravensfire: I have already mentioned in the help desk on Wikimedia that i am not being paid by anyone or by the Artist. If i was being paid then I would have disclosed it earlier. --CGOV (talk) 16:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

CGOV, that's good to hear. When someone claims to be in contact with official representatives, there's sometimes a paid relationship or at least a WP:COI that must be declared. It's not forbidden on Wikipedia, but it needs to be done in a transparent manner. Ravensfire (talk) 16:20, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Ravensfire: As for the picture, I contacted him through his official email id which is mentioned on his Facebook page. asked him for a picture and grant me a permission to use it.--CGOV (talk) 16:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ravensfire Yes i agree with you and i have read Wikipedia first. Last week the singer Amanat Ali was on every Pakistani news channel because his of new baby born, i tried to search for him here on Wikipedia but couldn't find him so i went to edit the article. I am not being paid by anyone or by him and i am not lucky to be in his management. My main focus is to edit and make articles on Pakistani singers.

--CGOV (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Great! And you did a really good job on the article, so even better! Ravensfire (talk) 16:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Ravensfire: Thank you so much :) --CGOV (talk) 16:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rinki Sethi has been accepted

Rinki Sethi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your good work on the references for Dominique Le Gendre

Whiteguru (talk) 07:26, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Danny Dean for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny Dean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Dean until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cordless Larry (talk) 11:38, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello Static Hash. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Danny Dean, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Static Hash. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Static Hash|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Cordless Larry (talk) 12:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)