User talk:TJMSmith
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is TJMSmith's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
Article policies
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
If you leave a message on this talk page, I'll respond here. You may want to watch this page to catch the response. Click here for a tutorial in watching pages. Please avoid using talkback messages if you can - if I've messaged you recently I'll either be watching your page or otherwise keeping an eye on it. |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Greg Locke approval, thanks!
Hey, thank you very much for approving my draft on Greg Locke! I'd temporarily abandoned work on it to focus on my studies, and so it was a lovely surprise to log on and discover that it had become a page. Thanks again, Swadge2 (talk) 04:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! I was about to start a page and saw you already had a great draft prepared. TJMSmith (talk) 11:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Laurie E. Locascio
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Laurie E. Locascio you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Forbes72 -- Forbes72 (talk) 13:21, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Laurie E. Locascio
The article Laurie E. Locascio you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Laurie E. Locascio for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Forbes72 -- Forbes72 (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 May 2022
- From the team: A changing of the guard
- News and notes: 2022 Wikimedia Board elections
- Community view: Have your say in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board elections
- In the media: Putin, Jimbo, Musk and more
- Special report: Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Discussion report: Portals, April Fools, admin activity requirements and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19 revisited
- Technology report: A new video player for Wikimedia wikis
- Featured content: Featured content of April
- Interview: Wikipedia's pride
- Serendipity: Those thieving image farms
- Recent research: 35 million Twitter links analysed
- Tips and tricks: The reference desks of Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Strange highs and strange lows
- News from Diff: Winners of the Human rights and Environment special nomination by Wiki Loves Earth announced
- News from the WMF: The EU Digital Services Act: What’s the Deal with the Deal?
- From the archives: The Onion and Wikipedia
- Humour: A new crossword
June events from Women in Red
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Carolyn Perrucci
I am in the midst of a GOCE edit on the article Carolyn Perrucci (which is very good; a fascinating and accomplished woman). The final citation in the bibliography - Perrucci, Carolyn - has an incorrect link to the citation for Haas, Violet B. The correct link is https://archives.lib.purdue.edu/agents/people/3180. I've fooled around with it, but am unclear how to correct it in . Can you? Thanks. Cleveland Todd (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for copyediting! I think that Haas link is used once to cite the book that Perrucci authored with Haas. I didn't see a mention of the book on Perrucci's own link (which seems rather odd). TJMSmith (talk) 16:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- @TJMSmith: The final entry in the bibliography section is Carolyn Perrucci; the preceding entry is Violet B. Haas. Both links lead to Haas. I think the Perrucci entry should lead to Perrucci at https://archives.lib.purdue.edu/agents/people/3180. I'm unclear how to physically revise the existing link in "source editing." While I'm at it, I think the article would be improved if there were some more personal information about Perrucci. Can you add a sentence or two? Thanks. Cleveland Todd (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)