User talk:TJMSmith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cleveland Todd (talk | contribs) at 14:53, 2 June 2022 (→‎Carolyn Perrucci). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Greg Locke approval, thanks!

Hey, thank you very much for approving my draft on Greg Locke! I'd temporarily abandoned work on it to focus on my studies, and so it was a lovely surprise to log on and discover that it had become a page. Thanks again, Swadge2 (talk) 04:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I was about to start a page and saw you already had a great draft prepared. TJMSmith (talk) 11:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Laurie E. Locascio

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Laurie E. Locascio you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Forbes72 -- Forbes72 (talk) 13:21, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Laurie E. Locascio

The article Laurie E. Locascio you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Laurie E. Locascio for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Forbes72 -- Forbes72 (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

June events from Women in Red

Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Carolyn Perrucci

I am in the midst of a GOCE edit on the article Carolyn Perrucci (which is very good; a fascinating and accomplished woman). The final citation in the bibliography - Perrucci, Carolyn - has an incorrect link to the citation for Haas, Violet B. The correct link is https://archives.lib.purdue.edu/agents/people/3180. I've fooled around with it, but am unclear how to correct it in . Can you? Thanks. Cleveland Todd (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for copyediting! I think that Haas link is used once to cite the book that Perrucci authored with Haas. I didn't see a mention of the book on Perrucci's own link (which seems rather odd). TJMSmith (talk) 16:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TJMSmith: The final entry in the bibliography section is Carolyn Perrucci; the preceding entry is Violet B. Haas. Both links lead to Haas. I think the Perrucci entry should lead to Perrucci at https://archives.lib.purdue.edu/agents/people/3180. I'm unclear how to physically revise the existing link in "source editing." While I'm at it, I think the article would be improved if there were some more personal information about Perrucci. Can you add a sentence or two? Thanks. Cleveland Todd (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]