User talk:Tcastles

Welcome!

Hi Tcastles! I noticed your contributions to Arati Saha and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Sahaib (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Immuta (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Based entirely on non-independent sources and is stuffed with peacock terms and marketing hype.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Immuta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Immuta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 06:36, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tcastles! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 06:36, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Immuta (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

These capital-raising sources are not in-depth coverage in secondary sources. The only sources on the companies actual business don't mention the company!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Immuta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 02:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Immuta (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As previously explained, these sources are in no way sufficient. Please do not resubmit without significant improvement to the sourcing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Immuta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 05:42, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stuartyeates,

Thank you for your very thorough edits! I'd like to briefly walk through each of your edits and the corrections I made as a result so that we can work together to ensure this article meets all of Wikipedia's standards.

Based entirely on non-independent sources and is stuffed with peacock terms and marketing hype. In this case, I added several independent sources and removed all non-independent sources, including any sources that directed back to the company's website or any investor websites. I also removed any language derived from the company's literature and website.
These capital-raising sources are not in-depth coverage in secondary sources. The only sources on the companies actual business don't mention the company! In this case, I included a citation in the funding section that leads to a Crunchbase.com overview of all the funding Immuta has ever received. On this page, you can click through to each round to see the funding amount, when the funding was received, and the lead investors. I also removed a citation that led to a source that explained RBAC & ABAC, but did not mention the company. Once this was removed, I added an independent trade publication source that explained RBAC & ABAC in reference to Immuta's work.
As previously explained, these sources are in no way sufficient. Please do not resubmit without significant improvement to the sourcing. At this point, I am reaching out to better understand your concerns before resubmitting so that we can minimize back and forth. I understand that you have concerns about the sources, but I do not understand which sources are raising this concern. Can you please be more specific, so that I can address accurately?

Thanks again for your thorough edits. I'm looking forward to addressing your feedback soon!

-tcastles Tcastles (talk) 20:09, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Immuta has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Immuta. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:08, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment, "blogs and routine funding rounds do not contribute to any notability," Theroadislong.

I have not excluded any blogs in the sources, and in reviewing Wikipedia's notability standards again, I believe this article meets them, having received ample coverage in:

- The Boston Globe

- Forbes

- Tech Crunch

- Reuters

- Nasdaq

- Datanami

- Venturebeat

- Crunchbase

- SecurityWeek

and more.

Taken from the Wikipedia's page on notability for organizations and companies:

"A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."

I believe all of the coverage listed above falls into that category.

Thank you again for your comment. Can you please let me know where else this article falls short? Tcastles (talk) 18:24, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Immuta has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Immuta. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your comment, Theroadislong. I was unaware that Crunchbase is not a viable source, so thanks for pointing that out. I've since removed all Crunchbase sources and replaced with reliable secondary sources.

Please let me know what other concerns you have — thanks again. Tcastles (talk) 20:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Immuta has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Immuta. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Theroadislong. I have ensured that all sources from top to bottom are reliable secondary sources. If there are any others that stand out, and if there is anything else I can do to ensure that this article meets Wikipedia's standards, please let me know. Thanks again. Tcastles (talk) 20:33, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Immuta (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DavidEfraim was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Immuta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DavidEfraim (talk) 13:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]