User talk:Teb00007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Teb00007 (talk | contribs) at 06:19, 5 August 2013 (→‎Woodlark: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Editing

I noticed your comment to Snowman. Why don't you enable Wiki-Ed in preferences? That highlights text, shows links and formatting. Also has useful tools, eg to convert the ndash hmtl to an actual dash in page ranges Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've just enabled it and it's much the same as the software I was using, only better. :) --teb00007 TalkContributions 15:02, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful links

If you need help, check out Getting Help below, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowman (talk) 12:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Woodlark

I'm not going to review this because I don't feel I'm impartial enough, but some comments

  • You need to extend the lead to be a fuller summary. There are entire sections, like the subspecies and feeding that aren't mentioned
  • Taxonomy. You don't say it's the only member of its genus, or say anything about the larks as a family
  • How do the subspecies differ?
  • You may be asked to give imperial conversions of units
  • Check grammar, "lark" shouldn't be capitalised, "The Woodlark prefers... They "
  • Check refs for consistency, eg, some initials have a full stop, some don't

You could put your nom on the project page, might attract a reviwer. Good luck, let me know if you need help Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:03, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your help. I'll go through this later. I'm currently working on the Eurasian Rock Pipit article. The only thing I wouldn't agree with is conversion to imperial measurements, as it's a scientific article. The science community widely uses only the metric system (e.g. in computing, biology and aquaculture at university I'm only allowed to use the metric system in assignments; many of the scientific journals I've read use exclusively metric measurements; the astronomy project on Wikipedia uses only the metric system). As well as that, it's easy to convert to imperial in your head (1 inch ≈ 2.5 centimetres; 1 foot ≈ 30 centimetres; 1 yard ≈ 90 centimetres). And this is a European species. Of course, if it's mandatory I'll update the article but I don't think it should be. Everything else you've pointed out, I'll get onto as soon as possible. --teb00007 TalkContributions 06:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]