User talk:ThePakistanihistorian

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Debal has been accepted

Siege of Debal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SamHolt6 (talk) 11:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — SamX [talk · contribs] 21:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — SamX [talk · contribs] 22:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Warning against personal attacks

Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries. Your edit summary may have been removed. Please communicate with civility and refrain from making personal attacks. Thank you. You used abusive language at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SamX Kindly refrain from making personal attacks Aryan330 (talk) 02:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

when did I ever personally attack you while you use the word "vandalism" for the edits that you disagree with. ThePakistanihistorian (talk) 05:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

@ThePakistanihistorian I don't even mentioned that you did vandalism!

I am not saying that you attacked me for personal reasons,I said that you used abusive words which leads to personal attack on user at where I mentioned Aryan330 (talk) 05:38, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

abusive words? where ThePakistanihistorian (talk) 05:41, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

@ThePakistanihistorian check you previous comments I don't repeat that continuously, against you have used the bad words, using words likw ameture didn't prove you the innocent.so kindly refrain from it as it wouldn't help you to consider your point true.you have used that words,check the talk section which I have mentioned. Aryan330 (talk) 05:44, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Oh my god, I said that "even the most amateurs (who are interested maratha mughal conflicts) know that this battle of sangamner was a mughal victory", I didn't refer this to you, I didn't use a single word against you in fact. I just pointed out that your behavior was quite hypocritical on the fact I never called your edits vandalism while you call my edits in good nature a vandalism, that's an attack on me in itself, kindly refrain from making false allegations on me or I will have to report you to a moderator. ThePakistanihistorian (talk) 05:53, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

@ThePakistanihistorian yes you can report as I didn't even used the word Vandalism in your entire talk page.

On that page I just told you that kindly refrain from using words which doesn't prove me a guilty nor prove you innocent.

You have used abusive language like hel* that's why I have warned you.

& Just that nothing else nor I am interested to do so. Aryan330 (talk) 05:57, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

@Aryan330: Both of you, knock it off. This sort of mud-slinging is going to get you both in trouble, and this will be at AE shortly anyway. If you must comment, do it there after I finish filing the report. — SamX [talk · contribs] 05:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

I apologize for this ThePakistanihistorian (talk) 06:00, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

@SamX I also apologize for this,as I am closing the discussion,thank you Aryan330 (talk) 06:00, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Melechha. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 07:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)