User talk:Tom harrison

For new users

If you are new here, welcome. The page Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers has links to a tutorial, and answers to frequently-asked questions.

Archives

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 28 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tom harrison/Archive 2007 . Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.

Previous discussions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Salafist jihadism

Based on your using the same source I did, plus your addition of another would you be so kind as to comment on the talk page regarding PassaMethods reverting of this same thing from the article please? The Last Angry Man (talk) 15:29, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Primitive Baptist article request

Hello. Would you mind unblocking the Primitive Baptist article so that it can be moved over a redirect to Primitive Baptists, or just make the move yourself? Similar moves at Baptists and Missionary Baptists and Reformed Baptists were made long ago (for more, you can read Talk:Baptists/Archive_5#Change_article_title_to_Baptists.3F). Thank you and happy editing! Novaseminary (talk) 23:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

No objection to moving it, but I'm no longer an administrator. You can request unprotection at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Sorry for any inconvenience, Tom Harrison ^Talk 12:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Verifiability

Thanks for reverting the erroneous edit I made to WT:V. I've explained on my talk page. Viriditas (talk) 00:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Why did you remove?

Why did you remove it on AE911Truth? Yes, I know you all have powers to censor and block, no need to link me over to some cases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by True Skepticism (talk • contribs) 23:21, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Adding promotional videos doesn't improve the article. That secondary sources don't mention them is an argument for leaving them out, not for putting them in. Tom Harrison ^Talk 23:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Mentioned in edit-warring noticeboard

In responding to Jordgette's motion on the edit-warring noticeboard I mentioned you and your activities on the 7 World Trade Center article. As a result any admin reviewing Jordgette's motion may take action against you. Sorry.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 07:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Building 7 article

Are you going to respond to my comments here and here?--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2011 (UTC)