User talk:TripWire

Welcome!

Hello, TripWire, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Cheers,
Riley Huntley _talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 14:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Try to be unbiased on Wikipedia,Government of India never recognised any trekkers/authors map on Siachen officially

some trekkers and authors viewpoint and their maps was never official position of Government of India and neither it recognised them--Koodfaand (talk) 10:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Nobody cares what is the official position of Govt of India if the international community thinks otherwise. I find it rather surprising that you have roughed out the sources as 'some' trekkers and authors. I think you need to read the importance of secondary sources at Wikipedia. There are 101 things which Govt of Pakistan does not agree with, does that change the fact that Wikipedia contains 1000s of edits which are not against the stated policy of Pakistan? Please stop unnecessary edit wars—TripWire ^talk 23:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Pakistan

Welcome!

We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan. There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much — or little — you like:

• You can give your input on issues at the project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
• You can add the project's to do list to your watchlist and help out with what interests you.
• You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
• Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan-related article on Wikipedia.
• Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
• Add your name in the members' list at WikiProject Pakistan members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: {{User WikiProject Pakistan}}
• You may also like to add your name to List of Pakistani Wikipedians by number of edits. To opt-in, add your name here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

Mar4d (talk) 18:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Word of advice

Before I actually have a look at the issue (since you've mentioned me), just a few words, and take it as good advice from an experienced user: You have to use the talk page to resolve any dispute. Don't make too many reverts. You are not allowed to make more than 3 reverts on an article. If you cross that limit, technically you can get reported and be blocked. So please, if you have made an extra revert on that article, consider undoing your edit for the time being so that things don't go down that route. And once again, please use the talk page before making any preemptive edits. If you don't, it will only land you in further trouble and invite others to scrutinise you. If you want to stay on Wikipedia and not get blocked, please take this advice seriously. I have become quite used to seeing constructive editors end up getting blocked from the site simply due to content disputes/nationalist edit wars. So please take a step back and don't engage in anything of that sort. Regards, Mar4d (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Also, although you've mentioned me, inviting users to support you in an argument can be taken as WP:CANVASSING, which is also frowned upon. So it is better to refrain from giving that impression. Mar4d (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Mar4d Thanks for the headsup. I understand that committing more than 3 reverts on an article will get me blocked, so I had avoided it. I was not knowing that one cannot directly invite other users. If that be the case, please if you can explain me the procedure for asking a third party opinion in case of a dispute? Lastly, I will request you once again to have a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mukti_Bahini thanks. —TripWire ^talk 20:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)19:07, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, the first preference of course is to resolve the dispute with the conflicting party on the talk page and come to a compromise. When that fails, you can request an WP:RFC for uninvolved third opinions or go to the neutral point of view noticeboards. If you want across-the-board opinions from people who may have relevant knowledge of the topic, it would be better to post on the talk pages of relevant WikiProjects, such as the Pakistan noticeboard and Bangladesh noticeboard, so that the users present there may chirp in. This is usually better than directly involving specific editors. At the moment, your aim should be to use the talk page as much as possible and engage constructively with the opposing editor. Regards, Mar4d (talk) 19:17, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

As Desired

Sir, User:TopGun and User:Mar4d having understood the rules as explained by Mar4d, I request your valuable comments at the RFC: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mukti_Bahini#RfC:_Should_the_revelations.2Fadmission_by_Prime_Minister_Modi_be_included_in_the_article.3F —TripWire ^talk 20:54, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Al Shams

@Mar4d:, @Faizan: This article mentions the same thing. Sources are Bengali news. Al-Shams (East Pakistan) --Cosmic  Emperor  05:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Al Shams role in 1971 can be seen in these references. Read the texts marked in yellow and scroll down.

1,

2 ,

Razaker's role.

Razakars in Pakistan Army.--Cosmic  Emperor  05:17, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Only a paragraph containing Crime Tribunal proceedings is referenced, rest of it is not verifiable. Faizan (talk) 05:25, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

You have to say, sources are reliable or not. Academic books are reliable or not. I am not going to investigate and verify myself. They appeared in google book search.WP:NOTTRUTH. Cosmic  Emperor  05:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

I am talking about the article, not about the above references you gave. Faizan (talk) 05:35, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Further discussion taking m=place at Talk:Bangladesh Liberation War. Faizan (talk) 09:29, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Was mistake I looked a wong source Please sop from insulting 82.11.33.86 (talk) 18:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

I never did at the first place, but if still you think it was an insult, I didnt say anything after the first message, so stop acting 'sensitive' —TripWire ^talk 19:09, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 82.11.33.86 (talk) 12:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Chamalang Coal Mines

Is to be deleted as in is a copyright of you blog. 82.11.33.86 (talk) 13:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)