User talk:Zigzig20s: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 748821287 by Nomoskedasticity (talk) I am not. I am trying to find consensus on the talkpage. Please stop.
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
Line 22: Line 22:
{{you've got mail|subject=The Wikipedia Library - OUP|ts=06:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)}}
{{you've got mail|subject=The Wikipedia Library - OUP|ts=06:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)}}
--[[User:Cameron11598|Cameron<sub><small>11598</small></sub>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Cameron11598|(Talk)]] </sup> 06:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
--[[User:Cameron11598|Cameron<sub><small>11598</small></sub>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Cameron11598|(Talk)]] </sup> 06:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction==
{{Ivmbox
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg
|imagesize=50px
|1=The following sanction now applies to you:

{{Talkquote|1=You have been topic banned from all pages related to climate change, broadly construed. Please read [[WP:TBAN]] to see what "topic banned" means}}

You have been sanctioned for persistent disruptive editing on [[Myron Ebell]] and its talkpage. Your restoration of ''8-year-old tags'' for tone and cleanup, with no specific claim of what the tone and cleanup issues might be, and no input on talk — merely "I did not add these tags. Please respect the other editors who did"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Myron_Ebell&diff=748818411&oldid=748817913] — is the last straw. I notice you made that edit after claiming no less than three times on the talkpage that you were leaving the article. It's getting quite hard to take those claims seriously. Your topic ban includes [[Myron Ebell]] and its talkpage, naturally.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2016|log of sanctions]]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banning policy]] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|here]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard.&nbsp;Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 16:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
}}

Revision as of 16:35, 10 November 2016

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 10:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Zigzig20s. You have new messages at Cameron11598's talk page.
Message added 18:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

--Cameron11598 (Talk) 18:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Zigzig20s. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is The Wikipedia Library - OUP.
Message added 06:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Cameron11598 (Talk) 06:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You have been topic banned from all pages related to climate change, broadly construed. Please read WP:TBAN to see what "topic banned" means

You have been sanctioned for persistent disruptive editing on Myron Ebell and its talkpage. Your restoration of 8-year-old tags for tone and cleanup, with no specific claim of what the tone and cleanup issues might be, and no input on talk — merely "I did not add these tags. Please respect the other editors who did"[1] — is the last straw. I notice you made that edit after claiming no less than three times on the talkpage that you were leaving the article. It's getting quite hard to take those claims seriously. Your topic ban includes Myron Ebell and its talkpage, naturally.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 16:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]