User talk:Zigzig20s
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Zigzig20s. |
Archives | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||
Contents
Editor of the Week[edit]
| Editor of the Week | ||
| Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your dedication. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
Outstanding American by Choice[edit]
User:Gerda Arendt, User:Yoninah, User:Cwmhiraeth: I don't want to be accused of spreading American propaganda, but I created Outstanding American by Choice a while back and I think it could be interesting to a "wide audience." I was wondering what it would take to turn it into a successful DYK. Would I need to add more referenced content to the paragraph at the top? Or flesh out the bios of each recipient?Zigzig20s (talk) 14:44, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- As you know, you will need about twice as much prose as you currently have (lists don't count), and every item sourced. Shouldn't be too hard, expanding example bios in the lead. Women Disobey ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, it was created on June 21st so would not qualify under the newness rule. It is currently 753 B in length, and that would have to be expanded fivefold for it to qualify under the expansion rule. Only the current lead paragraph is counted for this purpose as bullet points don't count. It's up to you whether you think this achievable. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Re "interesting to a broad audience"—this is referring to the hook, not the article. Catchy hooks are what you're aiming for. Yoninah (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- User:Yoninah: Good point. I think I would highlight their diversity of origin and occupation in the hook.Zigzig20s (talk) 14:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Re "interesting to a broad audience"—this is referring to the hook, not the article. Catchy hooks are what you're aiming for. Yoninah (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, it was created on June 21st so would not qualify under the newness rule. It is currently 753 B in length, and that would have to be expanded fivefold for it to qualify under the expansion rule. Only the current lead paragraph is counted for this purpose as bullet points don't count. It's up to you whether you think this achievable. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Break[edit]
You've been contributing so much on difficult subjects that a break will probably be good, but we'll miss you. It has been good to work with you. I've been getting back to WP after a long trip and am deciding which topics to tackle. Parkwells (talk) 14:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Telfair Hodgson[edit]
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Workplace bullying in academia[edit]
I would like to expand Workplace bullying in academia, ideally with more content from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies#Workplace bullying in academia.Zigzig20s (talk) 02:10, 7 October 2018 (UTC)