Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Thisisastackup/A giant crab comes forth: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
keep
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
*'''Keep''' - Drafts are not deleted for lacking notability. The page is clearly tagged as a draft and as such unlikely to be misleading. If people feel strongly about [[WP:FAKEARTICLE]] concerns, blanking and replacing with [[:Template:Userpage blanked]] would also be fine. It would have been better to not take up admin and MfD time with an MfD nom. [[User:A2soup|A2soup]] ([[User talk:A2soup|talk]]) 17:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - Drafts are not deleted for lacking notability. The page is clearly tagged as a draft and as such unlikely to be misleading. If people feel strongly about [[WP:FAKEARTICLE]] concerns, blanking and replacing with [[:Template:Userpage blanked]] would also be fine. It would have been better to not take up admin and MfD time with an MfD nom. [[User:A2soup|A2soup]] ([[User talk:A2soup|talk]]) 17:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - This is a draft. Lack of notability is reason to delete an article, but not to delete a draft. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 23:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - This is a draft. Lack of notability is reason to delete an article, but not to delete a draft. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 23:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
:If you keep voting to keep draft articles on non-notable topics, I'll moved them into article space and AfD them. When they are deleted by the larger community thr dtaft turned in a redirect will be deleted too. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 12:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:56, 25 February 2016

User:Thisisastackup/A giant crab comes forth

User:Thisisastackup/A giant crab comes forth (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

If the band and the members do not warrant articles, we don't do one on an album. Stale draft. Legacypac (talk) 05:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Drafts are not deleted for lacking notability. The page is clearly tagged as a draft and as such unlikely to be misleading. If people feel strongly about WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns, blanking and replacing with Template:Userpage blanked would also be fine. It would have been better to not take up admin and MfD time with an MfD nom. A2soup (talk) 17:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - This is a draft. Lack of notability is reason to delete an article, but not to delete a draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you keep voting to keep draft articles on non-notable topics, I'll moved them into article space and AfD them. When they are deleted by the larger community thr dtaft turned in a redirect will be deleted too. Legacypac (talk) 12:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]