Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions
Dreamy Jazz (talk | contribs) Removing request for arbitration: withdrawn by filer Tag: Replaced |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} |
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} |
||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=43%</noinclude>}} |
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=43%</noinclude>}} |
||
== JzG == |
|||
'''Initiated by ''' - [[user:MrX|MrX]][[user talk:MrX| 🖋]] '''at''' 15:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
=== Involved parties === |
|||
<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator --> |
|||
*{{admin|MrX}}, ''filing party'' |
|||
*{{userlinks|MrX}} |
|||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request |
|||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> |
|||
*[diff of notification MrX] |
|||
;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried |
|||
* [[User talk:JzG#Close_challenge|September 9, 2020]] |
|||
* [[User talk:JzG#AE closure|September 5, 2020]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1005#Threatened with block by edit-warring admin using "fuckoff" template|March 11, 2019]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel_and_others#JzG_(admonishment)|June 3, 2016]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive902#User JzG: ADMINACCT and INVOLVED|October 9, 2015]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJzG&type=revision&diff=684930652&oldid=684913499] |
|||
* [[User talk:JzG/Archive 116#Close of RfC at WP:Don't feed the divas|August 6, 2015]] |
|||
* [[User talk:JzG/Archive 107#Your ANI close|March 17, 2015]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive160#JzG|January 10, 2015]] |
|||
=== Statement by MrX === |
|||
I respectfully request that Arbcom open a case to fairly, but thoroughly, examine the history of JzG's actions as an administrator, and his general [[WP:ADMINCOND|conduct]] that reflects adversely on his role as an administrator. The area where JzG struggles the most is with closing and re-opening discussions. On several occasions he has circumvented normal process, often when he has been involved with the underlying subject. He has also been formally warned for incivility, has engaged in edit warring, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1005#Threatened_with_block_by_edit-warring_admin_using_%22fuckoff%22_template][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1035#Edit_warring_by_JzG][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stop_the_Church&diff=951768066&oldid=951618803] and has violated [[WP:INVOLVED]] on several occasions.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=684913499][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Condensed_matter_nuclear_science&diff=181387773&oldid=181387734]. His attitude when confronted with these concerns have frequently been dismissive, indicating that he is not willing or able to change his approach.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJzG&type=revision&diff=976922875&oldid=976922625][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJzG&type=revision&diff=977538913&oldid=977537862][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JzG&diff=next&oldid=684914810][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JzG&diff=next&oldid=684921942] |
|||
I've have been considering bringing this case request to Arbcom for several years, but I was hopeful that JzG would take the hint after receiving so much feedback from so many other people. The precipitating events that finally convinced me that a case was necessary are the two most recent ones linked in the 'Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried' section above. In the most recent one that I'm involved in, JzG re-opened an RfC[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APeople%27s_Mujahedin_of_Iran&type=revision&diff=977419604&oldid=977398324] that I had properly closed three and half weeks ago. I reverted him and raised my concern on his talk page, advising him that there was a [[WP:CLOSECHALLENGE]] in progress.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJzG&type=revision&diff=977534247&oldid=977492897] JzG then reverted me,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:People%27s_Mujahedin_of_Iran&diff=prev&oldid=977536556] effectively re-opening the RfC without regard to [[WP:CLOSECHALLENGE]]. He claimed that he did it because it was a [[WP:BADNAC]], but did not explain his reason. I dispute that [[WP:BADNAC]] applies. I am an experienced editor[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/MrX] who has closed nearly 100 RfCs[https://sigma.toolforge.org/usersearch.py?name=MrX&page=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FRequests_for_closure&server=enwiki&max=], and I am completely uninvolved with the subject. I'm not even sure how JzG found the RfC buried on the talk page of an article he has never edited. After my post to JzG's talk page, he then closed the [[WP:CLOSECHALLENGE]] discussion prematurely.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=977536955] |
|||
There is a great deal more evidence that can be brought to bear that will show that JzG is unsuited to continue holding adminship. Given the number of complaints about JzG evincing a pattern of admin misconduct, and these recent incidents, a case seems long overdue. Thank you. - [[user:MrX|MrX]][[user talk:MrX| 🖋]] 15:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
=== Statement by MrX === |
|||
=== Statement by {Non-party} === |
|||
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information. |
|||
<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * --> |
|||
=== JzG: Clerk notes === |
|||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' |
|||
* |
|||
=== JzG: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> === |
|||
{{anchor|1=JzG: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small> |
|||
* |
|||
Revision as of 15:20, 9 September 2020
Requests for arbitration
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
JzG | 9 September 2020 | 0/0/0 |
Case name | Closed |
---|---|
Conflict of interest management | 13 Apr 2024 |
Mzajac | 7 May 2024 |
Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing | none | (orig. case) | 30 April 2024 |
Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 4 | none | (orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation | none | (orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|
JzG
Initiated by - MrX 🖋 at 15:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Involved parties
- MrX (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), filing party
- MrX (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- [diff of notification MrX]
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- September 9, 2020
- September 5, 2020
- March 11, 2019
- June 3, 2016
- October 9, 2015 [1]
- August 6, 2015
- March 17, 2015
- January 10, 2015
Statement by MrX
I respectfully request that Arbcom open a case to fairly, but thoroughly, examine the history of JzG's actions as an administrator, and his general conduct that reflects adversely on his role as an administrator. The area where JzG struggles the most is with closing and re-opening discussions. On several occasions he has circumvented normal process, often when he has been involved with the underlying subject. He has also been formally warned for incivility, has engaged in edit warring, [2][3][4] and has violated WP:INVOLVED on several occasions.[5][6]. His attitude when confronted with these concerns have frequently been dismissive, indicating that he is not willing or able to change his approach.[7][8][9][10]
I've have been considering bringing this case request to Arbcom for several years, but I was hopeful that JzG would take the hint after receiving so much feedback from so many other people. The precipitating events that finally convinced me that a case was necessary are the two most recent ones linked in the 'Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried' section above. In the most recent one that I'm involved in, JzG re-opened an RfC[11] that I had properly closed three and half weeks ago. I reverted him and raised my concern on his talk page, advising him that there was a WP:CLOSECHALLENGE in progress.[12] JzG then reverted me,[13] effectively re-opening the RfC without regard to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. He claimed that he did it because it was a WP:BADNAC, but did not explain his reason. I dispute that WP:BADNAC applies. I am an experienced editor[14] who has closed nearly 100 RfCs[15], and I am completely uninvolved with the subject. I'm not even sure how JzG found the RfC buried on the talk page of an article he has never edited. After my post to JzG's talk page, he then closed the WP:CLOSECHALLENGE discussion prematurely.[16]
There is a great deal more evidence that can be brought to bear that will show that JzG is unsuited to continue holding adminship. Given the number of complaints about JzG evincing a pattern of admin misconduct, and these recent incidents, a case seems long overdue. Thank you. - MrX 🖋 15:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Statement by MrX
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
JzG: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
JzG: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)