Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case
Requests for arbitration
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
| Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use of single and primary sources in Sri Lankan Civil War articles | 29 April 2024 | 0/0/0 | |
| Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute | 29 April 2024 | 0/0/0 |
| Case name | Closed |
|---|---|
| Conflict of interest management | 13 Apr 2024 |
| Mzajac | 7 May 2024 |
| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing | none | (orig. case) | 30 April 2024 |
| Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 4 | none | (orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
| Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation | none | (orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|
Use of single and primary sources in Sri Lankan Civil War articles
Initiated by Cossde (talk) at 05:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Proposed parties
- Cossde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Petextrodon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Tame Rhino (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- [diff of notification Petextrodon]
- [diff of notification Tame Rhino]
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_attacks_on_civilians_attributed_to_Sri_Lankan_government_forces#Request_for_multiple_citations
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_attacks_on_civilians_attributed_to_Sri_Lankan_government_forces#NESOHR
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_attacks_on_civilians_attributed_to_Sri_Lankan_government_forces#Adding_single_sourced_content
Statement by Cossde
This page as seen weeks of WP:BATTLEGROUND and possible WP:NAT editing, with controversial content been added with single sources that are most cases primary sources that have clear conflict of intrests and even been labled "pro-rebal". Some other sources with WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS, that makes the content appear WP:OR. Request for more citations per WP:EXCEPTIONAL and WP:CHALLENGE have been refused. Hence I am requesting arbitration to settle this matter by establishing the quality, type and style of citations needed for this artcile. Cossde (talk) 05:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Statement by Petextrodon
Statement by Tame Rhino
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)
Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute
Initiated by StillWatchesCartoons (talk) at 05:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Proposed parties
- StillWatchesCartoons (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- SounderBruce (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- [diff of notification SounderBruce]
- [diff of notification Username]
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- Link 1
- Link 2
Statement by StillWatchesCartoons
On April 28, 2024, I updated a ten-year old map in the Seattle metropolitan area page using guidance provided by an official U.S. government OMB publication. The individual in question here reverted my edits without, claiming that my edits were "unnecessarily complicated map" and "disruptive." He also threatened to have me banned as an editor. By reviewing his extensive edits on the page in question, he has taken an monopolistic ownership of this and several pages in violation of the spirit of Wikipedia. Nor does he respect other editors' contributions as thinly veiled stylistic disputes. I am open to stylistic changes and I am not familiar with every rule, and your other editors have been very helpful in providing guidance.
Maximum of 500 words (you can use http://www.wordcounter.net/ to check). You should use diffs and links to support the case you are making, and try to convince the arbitrators that the dispute requires their intervention. You are not trying to exhaustively prove your case at this time; if your case is accepted for arbitration, an evidence page will be created that you can use to provide more detail.
- ATTENTION:*
- Once you have entered all required information into this template, preview and then save it. It will place the request in a new section at the bottom of Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case.
- You must inform all parties that they have been named in this request using You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#CASENAME and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks,.
- Once you have done this provide the diff of the notification in the area provided.
- If you have any questions or problems please ask a clerk for help or post on Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks.
-->
Statement by SounderBruce
Statement by Username
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)