Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote/The Fat Man Who Never Came Back

The Fat Man Who Never Came Back

Greetings, neighbors and colleagues. I am the Fat Man Who Never Came Back. I have voiced my ongoing displeasure with the Committee's performance this year, complaining that the committee as a whole is ineffectual, indecisive, uncommunicative and largely unresponsive to the demands and needs of the community. Many colleagues who share this point of view, or who otherwise tire of the "types" of candidates being perennially regurgitated, have begged me to run for a spot on the Committee. I have avoided declaring my candidacy in the hope that several bold, fresh and plausible voices from outside the crowd of AN/I and RfARB regulars would step onto the stage. For the most part, they have not materialized; the names I see on the ballot (while sometimes indicative of decent editors and administrators, impressive in their encyclopedic accomplishments) do not inspire confidence that an overhaul of the way ArbCom functions is likely, or even possible. With seven open seats, this may be the only real opportunity to radically change the composition and disposition of the Committee over the next few years.

The committee needs an injection of independence, clear communication and common sense. I support a more welcoming environment for expert content contributors and strong writers as well as an end to internal cronyism, favoritism and needless behind-the-scenes machinations. Though the Committee does not dictate editorial policy, I would not refrain from using my position on the Committee to throw considerable weight behind reforms that would help bolster Wikipedia's prestige with the outside world: greater sensitivity toward BLPs; exploring the implementation of flagged revisions; and an easy and straightforward process for demoting poorly performing administrators. Let the Fat Man help regain your trust and confidence.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

• The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk · contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks_suspected · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)
• Questions for the candidate
• Discuss the candidate
• Support or Oppose this candidate

Support

1. HiDrNick! 00:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
2. Sluzzelin talk 00:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
3. You see, this is what the Arbcom needs. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 00:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
4. Earnest Support. It may be tilting at windmills, but I actually think his would be a valuable voice to have on the committee. There are fifteen or more Arbs on the committee. I think having one single voice out of the fifteen be a bit of a gadfly would actually be of enormous benefit to the project. --Alecmconroy (talk) 00:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
5. — Ѕandahl ♥ 00:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
6. Support - Shot info (talk) 00:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
7. Rationale. Giggy (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
8. Support, per User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes. Jehochman ^Talk 00:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
9. Support SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Nufy8 (talk) 00:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
2. Oppose. Rschen7754 (T C) 00:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
3. --Kanonkas :  Talk  00:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
4. Oppose Unsportsmanlike conduct toward fellow candidates. Durova^Charge! 00:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
5. Serious concern about judgement given his comments and opposition toward other candidates. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
6. Dlabtot (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
7. Voyaging^(talk) 00:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
8. Strong oppose. Appears to be a joke nom by a non-admin and self-proclaimed "parasite" on Wikipedia. Further comments and diffs available at my ACE2008 notes page. --Elonka 00:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)